2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11134-010-9168-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The idle period of the finite G/M/1 queue with an interpretation in risk theory

Abstract: We consider a G/M/1 queue with restricted accessibility in the sense that the maximal workload is bounded by 1. If the current workload V t of the queue plus the service time of an arriving customer exceeds 1, only 1 − V t of the service requirement is accepted. We are interested in the distribution of the idle period, which can be interpreted as the deficit at ruin for a risk reserve process R t in the compound Poisson risk model. For this risk process a special dividend strategy applies, where the insurance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By interpreting the interarrival times of the claims as service times of the corresponding queue and the claim sizes as interarrival times of the queue, the standard Cramér-Lundberg model is translated into a G/M/1 queue. The time to ruin in the Cramér-Lundberg model is now related to a busy period of the corresponding queue, the deficit at ruin to an idle period, and the surplus just before ruin to the sojourn time of the last customer in a busy period (see [16] and [19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By interpreting the interarrival times of the claims as service times of the corresponding queue and the claim sizes as interarrival times of the queue, the standard Cramér-Lundberg model is translated into a G/M/1 queue. The time to ruin in the Cramér-Lundberg model is now related to a busy period of the corresponding queue, the deficit at ruin to an idle period, and the surplus just before ruin to the sojourn time of the last customer in a busy period (see [16] and [19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the GI/G/1 case, queueing model 1 corresponds to the standard finite dam with constant release rule; various versions have been treated in [2], [3], [6], [10], [11], [12], [21], [24], and [27]. From the point of view of prospective customers, the two models also represent GI/G/1 with deterministic customer patience.…”
Section: Queueingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the GI/G/1 case, queueing model 1 corresponds to the standard finite dam with constant release rule; various versions have been treated in [2], [3], [6], [10], [11], [12], [21], [24], and [27]. From the point of view of prospective customers, the two models also represent GI/G/1 with deterministic customer patience.…”
Section: Queueingmentioning
confidence: 99%