The ideology of development and legitimation: beyond ‘Kazakhstan 2030’

Kudaibergenova, Diana T.

doi:10.1080/02634937.2015.1115275

Cited by 34 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For comparative research, Kazakhstan and Poland were selected as the most representative and comparable countries of Central Europe and Central Asia. We chose Kazakhstan because it is characterised by the most stable internal policy, the highest level of perception of Russian/European institutions, and economic culture and reforms introduced in the direction of the free market economy [45]. Poland is the largest country in Central Europe and was chosen as it is the most comparable to the post-Soviet Central Asian state in terms of territory.…”

Section: Research Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Political and Historical Determinants of the Differentiation of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems of Agritourism in Poland and Kazakhstan

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: In the context of differences among countries developing pre-entrepreneurship ecosystems in relation to agritourism, the need to define the specific challenges and facilitators in the group of post-communist countries is recognised. Given that, we aim to examine the differences between the countries belonging to the former USSR and the satellite countries of the former USSR. (2) Methods: For the realisation of the intended objective, we analysed studies of the literature on the subject, in terms of the theoretical treatment of the entrepreneurial eco-system in the field of agritourism, and current legal acts. Our own observations from stays in the regions in question were also used, along with statistical methods concerning the density of the transport network, comparative analysis of historical and political conditions, and SWOT analysis. (3) Results: Substantial differences were found between the components of the agritourism entrepreneurship ecosystem in Poland and Kazakhstan, primarily related to the level of transport infrastructure density (satisfactory in West Pomeranian Voivodeship, insufficient in North Kazakhstan), tradition of individual farming (well established in Poland, poorly present in Kazakhstan), support for agritourism development by central and local authorities (relatively high in Poland, incidental and with a short history in Kazakhstan), and finally, differences in the target group of agritourism service recipients (stable in Poland, undefined in Kazakhstan). (4) Conclusions: The research leads to the conclusion of the heterogeneity of the determinants of the development of the agritourism entrepreneurship ecosystem in countries collectively defined as post-communist. There are clearly different challenges and facilitations resulting not so much from the past political system as from the ethnic-historical considerations, the position of agriculture in the economy, and the degree and effectiveness of the involvement of administrative authorities in the development of agritourism. The study leads to a recommendation on the need for more efficient targeting of agritourism consumers abroad.

show abstract

Section: Research Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Political and Historical Determinants of the Differentiation of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems of Agritourism in Poland and Kazakhstan

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kudaibergenova (2015) offers a detailed analysis of this program and illustrates how it is used by the regime for legitimating its rule.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The electronic face of authoritarianism: E-government as a tool for gaining legitimacy in competitive and non-competitive regimes

Maerz¹

2016

Government Information Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As Marat (2010, p. 45) points out 'since the 1990s, Kazakhstan has been investing large sums of money to ameliorate its international image' (see also Laruelle 2016Laruelle , 2018. Indeed, over the years, the Kazakh leadership has emphasised that they offer a stable political situation, strive for economic development and are open to foreign investors (Kudaibergenova 2015). This rhetorical policy is seen as a reflection of the 'accompanying pragmatism' of Kazakhstan's political elites (Collins and Bekenova 2017, p. 15).…”

Section: Kazakhstan and International Partnersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reconciling climate change leadership with resource nationalism and regional vulnerabilities: a case-study of Kazakhstan

Poberezhskaya

Danilova

2021

Environmental Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This contribution explores how climate change is presented in one of the most established Kazakhstani newspapers, Kazakhstanskaya Pravda. Using quantitative and qualitative frame analyses, we explore patterns of climate change communication through the focus on framing of climate science, consequences, and responsibilities. We argue that resource nationalism shapes climate discussion in Kazakhstan with climate change emerging as a statecontrolled 'resource'. We also identify that the coverage of national and international responsibilities is reflective of Kazakhstan's geopolitical vulnerabilities arising from its ambiguous relationship with Russia as well as attempts at presenting itself as being at the front of global sustainable development.

show abstract

The ideology of development and legitimation: beyond ‘Kazakhstan 2030’

Cited by 34 publications

References 19 publications

Political and Historical Determinants of the Differentiation of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems of Agritourism in Poland and Kazakhstan

Political and Historical Determinants of the Differentiation of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems of Agritourism in Poland and Kazakhstan

The electronic face of authoritarianism: E-government as a tool for gaining legitimacy in competitive and non-competitive regimes

Reconciling climate change leadership with resource nationalism and regional vulnerabilities: a case-study of Kazakhstan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About