2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The identification of vertical velocity profiles using an inertial sensor to investigate pre-impact detection of falls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest RMSD values were found for HW, even indicating a significant difference for vertical CoM position and velocity, and upper body angular velocity. One of the fall indicators, the vertical velocity of the center of mass, of which the threshold was set at −1.3 m/s by Bourke et al (2008), showed RMSD values that were considerably lower (0.05-0.20 m/s) than the threshold value. The RMSD values found with a 95% confidence interval of vertical CoM position and upper body orientation were, due to their small magnitude, considered to be practically not important.…”
Section: Figure 7 | Coefficients Of Determination Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The largest RMSD values were found for HW, even indicating a significant difference for vertical CoM position and velocity, and upper body angular velocity. One of the fall indicators, the vertical velocity of the center of mass, of which the threshold was set at −1.3 m/s by Bourke et al (2008), showed RMSD values that were considerably lower (0.05-0.20 m/s) than the threshold value. The RMSD values found with a 95% confidence interval of vertical CoM position and upper body orientation were, due to their small magnitude, considered to be practically not important.…”
Section: Figure 7 | Coefficients Of Determination Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of IMUs is that they do not allow to directly measure one highly specific predictor for imminent falls: linear velocity in vertical direction. This has proven to be a valuable source of information both in literature (Wu, 2000;Bourke et al, 2008) and in our own experience with the FLOAT rehabilitation robot of Vallery et al (2013). Despite recent advances in filtering techniques for IMUs (Seel et al, 2014), they cannot deliver linear velocity information without drift or additional assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sway and standing balance have been estimated using accelerometry and gyro-sensors. Several other gait performance measures, including the TUG test, have also been evaluated [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Various parameters have been measured and collected to classify the risk of falling among the elderly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the attitude information is sufficient for this subtraction and does not require the full 3-D orientation. This is essential if one wishes to estimate velocities and positions through the integration of the external acceleration in applications such as fall detection [19], [20]. However, although external acceleration is the main source of the attitude estimation error and despite the need for its accurate estimation in many applications, the problem of estimating the external acceleration during the orientation estimation has not been explicitly discussed in the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%