1988
DOI: 10.7863/jum.1988.7.2.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The identification of ulcerative plaque with high resolution duplex carotid scanning.

Abstract: A retrospective study evaluated 50 patients who had pathologically proven intraplaque hemorrhage. The patients were pathologically divided into two groups by the presence or absence of intimal ulcerations. These two groups were then sonographically compared with regard to surface characteristics of the plaque, plaque size, size of the sonolucent area within the plaque, and location of the sonolucent area relative to the intimal surface. No defined sonographic characteristics could be used to separate these two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our work, US-ECD sensitivity in detecting ulcers was only 37.5%; these values are similar to data produced by other authors. 24,43,44 This can be ascribed, in part, to the fact that acoustic shadowing from calcification obscures ulcers, and the sonography probe may not be parallel to the axis of the vessel in the region of the ulceration. In our radiology practice, we always looked for ulceration when we analyzed carotid arteries, and considering the high MDCTA sensitivity and specificity, a radiologist should look for plaque ulcerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work, US-ECD sensitivity in detecting ulcers was only 37.5%; these values are similar to data produced by other authors. 24,43,44 This can be ascribed, in part, to the fact that acoustic shadowing from calcification obscures ulcers, and the sonography probe may not be parallel to the axis of the vessel in the region of the ulceration. In our radiology practice, we always looked for ulceration when we analyzed carotid arteries, and considering the high MDCTA sensitivity and specificity, a radiologist should look for plaque ulcerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Saba et al 15 have recently showed that ultrasound has a high specificity (93%) but a low sensitivity (38%) for the detection of carotid ulceration, which is in concordance with previous studies. 20,21 The low sensitivity can be ascribed, in part, to the fact that acoustic shadowing from calcifications obscures the presence of ulcerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these criteria, B-mode imaging has failed to provide a satisfactory diagnostic yield for ulcerative plaques with a sensitivity of only 47% [70]. Other groups have been unable to distinguish between the presence or absence of intimal ulcerations with B-mode scans [57]. Diagnostic sensitivity for detecting plaque ulceration with ultrasound is affected by the degree of carotid stenosis and increases to 77% in plaques associated with 50% or less stenosis [27].…”
Section: Plaque Development – the Intermediate Stagementioning
confidence: 99%