The past two decades have witnessed tremendous progress in seismological, geodynamical, geomagnetic, and mineral physics efforts to quantify deep Earth processes. Our understanding of structures and processes in the lowermost mantle has advanced accordingly, and there is now widespread agreement that some form of major thermo-chemical boundary layer (TCBL) exists on the mantle side of the core-mantle boundary (CMB), extending at least several hundred kilometers upward into the lower mantle. Boundary layers play critical roles in heat transport and dominant length scales of thermal convection systems, so there is a concerted effort to understand the lowermost mantle boundary layer. The endmember conceptual models now being considered for the TCBL at the base of the mantle are reviewed here along with Book Title Book Series Seismological and geodynamical observations have established the presence of a major thermo-chemical boundary layer (TCBL) in the lowermost mantle. This boundary layer plays a critical role in regulating heat flow through the core-mantle boundary, thereby influencing the dynamo-generating core flow regime. It also plays an important role in the mantle convection system, possibly serving as a source of boundary-layer instabilities and as a reservoir for long-lived geochemical heterogeneities. Two end-member conceptual models for the TCBL have emerged, both reconcilable with current observational constraints: a global, stably-stratified, chemically distinct layer may exist in the lowermost 250 km of the mantle (the global TCBL model), or this region may be a partially mixed boundary layer involving a composite of downwelling thermo-chemical anomalies such as oceanic lithospheric slabs or eclogitic oceanic crustal components and ancient dense chemical anomalies dynamically concentrated into large agglomerations beneath upwellings (the hybrid TCBL model). For the global TCBL model, laterally varying partial melt fractions within the layer are required to account for various seismological observations, and large dynamic topography on the upper boundary of this layer is expected: there is evidence for both of these attributes of the TCBL. The hybrid TCBL model requires additional complexity such as a phase transition or structural fabric transition to account for various seismological observations: some mineralogical candidates have been proposed. The outstanding challenge, requiring multi-disciplinary advances, is to discriminate between these competing conceptual models, as they differ in implications for thermal history, chemical processing, and dynamical behavior of the TCBL.
CORE-MANTLE BOUNDARY STRUCTURE AND PROCESSES