1968
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1968.tb06386.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE IDENTIFICATION OF BETULA NANA POLLEN

Abstract: SUMMARYThere are three approaches to the problem of distinguishing the pollen of Betula nana. Grain morphology is not considered a reliable criterion. Size measurements alone serve to distinguish B. nana pollen from B. tortuosa, whilst the grain diameter: pore depth ratio distinguishes B. nana frotn B. pubescens. Reliable separation of B. nana pollen from tree birch pollen requires both these parameters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the history is reconstructed using sub-fossil pollen from sediments as a main source, emphasis is usually made on differentiating the tree-birch pollen of B. pubescens from the pollen of dwarf-shrub birch B. nana (e.g. Birks, 1968;Mäkelä, 1999;Caseldine, 2001). The results of the present study suggest that the hybridisation of the two species, which has presumably led to the establishment of mountain birch (B. pubescens ssp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the history is reconstructed using sub-fossil pollen from sediments as a main source, emphasis is usually made on differentiating the tree-birch pollen of B. pubescens from the pollen of dwarf-shrub birch B. nana (e.g. Birks, 1968;Mäkelä, 1999;Caseldine, 2001). The results of the present study suggest that the hybridisation of the two species, which has presumably led to the establishment of mountain birch (B. pubescens ssp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This finding may provide a means to detect the presence of hybrid pollen in a mixed sample, by its unique morphology, and to calculate proportions of hybrid pollen according to distribution curves, especially those with low D/P ratios. Birks (1968) emphasized the usefulness of D/P ratio in distinguishing pollen of the tree birch B. pubescens from that of the dwarf birch B. nana (lower D/P ratio in B. pubescens), but the problem seemed to be with the pollen of mountain birch (B. pubescens ssp. tortuosa).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other tree pollen was assumed to be reworked. A division between pollen of B. nana Birks, 1968;Usinger, 1977;Kolstrup, 1982;Ma «kela «, 1996;Blackmore et al, 2003); since they overlap in size and shape the identi¢cation remains tentative. Furthermore, pollen of Poaceae with pollen grains s 35 and 9 35 Wm were separated.…”
Section: Botanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Betula pubescens (tree birch) was the dominant tree taxon during the Lateglacial period in Denmark but the separation of tree birch pollen from that of B. nana (dwarf birch) is problematic (Birks 1968;Usinger 1977;Andersen 1980). In addition, local pollen production is limited in Arctic environments, and the contribution of pollen transported a long distance can be disproportionately high, which can lead to misleading results (see Birks and Birks 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%