2018
DOI: 10.3998/tia.17063888.0037.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Idea of Educational Development: An Historical Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we reach our current age, variously characterized as the age of assessment or the age of organizational development, we also see CTLs coming in from the margins, shedding some of their roots in service, and taking on roles as leaders and drivers of change (Austin & Sorcinelli, 2013;Kelley et al, 2017;Schroeder, 2011). And our strength as change leaders comes from our networks and deep-seated, long-standing relationships with our faculty, which can serve as the basis for an emerging form of fellowship, one in which faculty partners serve as levers or linchpins to foster vibrant communities of teaching and learning and extend the teaching and learning capacity of the institution and beyond (Cruz, 2018;Felten et al, 2007;Stark & Smith, 2016).…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we reach our current age, variously characterized as the age of assessment or the age of organizational development, we also see CTLs coming in from the margins, shedding some of their roots in service, and taking on roles as leaders and drivers of change (Austin & Sorcinelli, 2013;Kelley et al, 2017;Schroeder, 2011). And our strength as change leaders comes from our networks and deep-seated, long-standing relationships with our faculty, which can serve as the basis for an emerging form of fellowship, one in which faculty partners serve as levers or linchpins to foster vibrant communities of teaching and learning and extend the teaching and learning capacity of the institution and beyond (Cruz, 2018;Felten et al, 2007;Stark & Smith, 2016).…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%