A detailed a d y & of a tekwision report exphres the conjunction of the techwhgks o f wa$are and of communication that reveals &ralptotypes and creates a muster nurrm've for the strategic defme program.Journalists know they write "stories," and we know that we watch "stories" and read them, but we are not sufficiently attentive to the consequences of these acts. For "news" occurs where texts and events come together, at that place where the reporter puts a name to things, tells a story about them, and thereby gives them a structure. Narrative conventions bring order to events by making them something that can be told about; by organizing experience, they exert a powerful pull on journalists and publics alike. As individuals and as a people, we tell the stories we need to hear to make sense of the world. Reality appears to us, but we grasp it through the tales we choose to tell to ourselves, our way (30).Journalists grasp the world by making a text of it, and for those who seek to understand the journalistic act, this textualization of the world thus becomes a primary object of study. This article takes a single television news report and inquires into the strategies that governed the way it made its subject into a story, the way it transformed the world into a text. It does so in a sphere of textual and cultural studies loosely circumscribed by the work of such writers as Roland Barthes and Michel Foucault ( 4 ,22, 27,44). But it is in no sense a systematic application of their work. It is rather a provisional attempt to describe the logic according to which meaning is created, an effort to describe how truth-effects are produced, to open up a space of possibility for regarding the discourse of television journalism in the nuclear era.