2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Icare HOME (TA022) Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
47
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 11 13 A significant limitation to use, however, is the relatively high number of patients failing certification, ranging from 20% in the current study to 26% in other studies, which may in part be magnified by age. 24 , 25 , 42 We also observed greater difficulty for patients to obtain measurements for the left eye compared with the right; although the exact reasons require further investigation, eye and hand dominance may be contributing factors. Nonetheless, if training and certification are successfully completed, patients generally perceived the iCare HOME as either acceptable or easy to use in concurrence with previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 11 13 A significant limitation to use, however, is the relatively high number of patients failing certification, ranging from 20% in the current study to 26% in other studies, which may in part be magnified by age. 24 , 25 , 42 We also observed greater difficulty for patients to obtain measurements for the left eye compared with the right; although the exact reasons require further investigation, eye and hand dominance may be contributing factors. Nonetheless, if training and certification are successfully completed, patients generally perceived the iCare HOME as either acceptable or easy to use in concurrence with previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“… 23 26 With appropriate training and instruction, most patients were able to successfully perform self-tonometry with the advantage of obtaining intraocular pressure measurements in the patient's habitual environment and fewer visits to the health practitioner's office. 24 , 25 Previous reports investigating diurnal intraocular pressure with rebound self-tonometry have demonstrated high intraindividual variation across consecutive days, with participants exhibiting different diurnal curve patterns from day to day. 21 , 22 However, no studies to date have investigated diurnal curve fluctuations with iCare HOME for more than a week.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous data also show that the mean Icare HOME IOP was lower than that obtained with GAT 1.03 mmHg (95% LOA was between −5.98 and 3.91 mmHg) by self-measurement. 9 Despite using the same long probe for Icare TA01i and examination of reports for various age ranges, 9 , 10 , 12 , 30 , 32 , 33 the IOP obtained with Icare HOME was slightly lower than that obtained with GAT. This tendency is probably explained by 1) the instrument itself, and not the probe, because the IOP values with both self- and second party measurements are lower than those for GAT.…”
Section: The Characteristics Of Each Device and Iop Valuesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“… 32 Mudie et al reported that the IOP difference between GAT was −0.33 mmHg (95% LOA was unclear) with self-measurement. 33 Only Takagi et al reported that the IOP difference between GAT was 0.70 mmHg (95% LOA was between −3.07 and 4.46 mmHg) with self-measurement and 0.91 mmHg (95% LOA was between −2.75 and 4.56 mmHg) as measured by a second party. 34 …”
Section: The Characteristics Of Each Device and Iop Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Mudie et al evaluated Icare HOME and found that from 189 recruited patients, 4% failed to complete the study due to time concerns and 6% had difficulty using the device. 17 Further studies are required to assess the validity of home tonometry.…”
Section: Potential Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%