2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The IAEA handbook on radionuclide transfer to wildlife

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The CR wo-soil values for the RAPs were derived from the database described by Copplestone et al (in-press) which has also been used to derive CR wo-media values for a forthcoming IAEA handbook presenting radionuclide transfer values for wildlife (Howard et al 2013;Yankovich et al in-press). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CR wo-soil values for the RAPs were derived from the database described by Copplestone et al (in-press) which has also been used to derive CR wo-media values for a forthcoming IAEA handbook presenting radionuclide transfer values for wildlife (Howard et al 2013;Yankovich et al in-press). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have made a simple attempt to allow for this by considering the number of data (below and above 10 and the number of reference sources contributing to the GM value). However, clearly a more rigorous analysis considering the variation in the data and whether the data are from a variety of different sites or not (where this information is known) would also help to assess the robustness of the CRwo-soil value given in the ICRP and IAEA documents (ICRP 2009;Howard et al 2013;Wood et al 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 summarises the mean values, minima and maxima, and number of available data for each CRwo-soil value for Wildlife -TRS groups similar to the RAPs (see Howard et al, 2013). There are a few mean (GM or AM) CRwo-soil values in the Wildlife -TRS (Howard et al, 2013) which exceed a value of 1 for organisms relevant to RAPs. The number of CRwo-soil values is greater than in Table 1, as the group/subcategory contain species which are not members of the Family defined for each RAP.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations