“…Interestingly, some of the reported inhibitors have been observed to preferentially interfere with the DLGex–Keap1 binding compared with the ETGE–Keap1 binding . Considering that the main difference between the Keap1–Nrf2 ETGE interaction and the Keap1–Nrf2 DLGex interaction lies in the P6 subpocket, highlighting the P6 subpocket in drug design might hold enormous promise for the development of Keap1–Nrf2 inhibitors with better selectivity. , In addition, targeting the β-TrCP–Nrf2 pathway has been considered as an unexplored alternative to develop Nrf2 activators with higher target selectivity. ,, Recently, the first β-TrCP - Nrf2 PPI inhibitor has been successfully discovered, which represents a new direction for the future exploitation of safe and potent Nrf2 activators . Mounting evidence suggests that pharmacologic inhibition of BTB and CNC homology 1 (Bach1), a physiological repressor of Nrf2, also represents a promising approach to activate the Nrf2–ARE pathway without involving the electrophilic modification of cellular proteins. , In this regard, BACH1 inhibitors have opened the door for a new class of nonelectrophilic Nrf2 activators. , It is noteworthy that glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) can phosphorylate Nrf2, stimulating its association with β-TrCP and precipitating Nrf2 ubiquitination. , Therefore, GSK-3β inhibitors offer additional ways to activate Nrf2 without electrophilicity concerns. − More attention should be devoted to these areas.…”