2010
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.31076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The P‐value illusion: How to improve (psychiatric) genetic studies

Abstract: There is an emerging appreciation that genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have failed to live up to expectations and deliver major advances to date. A "surge" strategy, of pooling resources and increasing number of subjects tested, is underway. We argue that, while useful, it will not be enough by itself. Complementary approaches are needed to mine these large datasets. We describe a series of problems, opportunities, and offer a potential comprehensive solution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…rate is comparable to other recent studies (15,16) and could be attributed to cohort and disease heterogeneity (17,18).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…rate is comparable to other recent studies (15,16) and could be attributed to cohort and disease heterogeneity (17,18).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Using a genomic control method, we found no evidence of population stratification. While increasing the sample size and determining Bonferroni-corrected p values can be helpful to address multiple comparisons, these approaches alone may not be enough to address the complexity and heterogeneity of an illness like CFS [20] . Validating these findings will require replication of SNP and gene expression analysis in a replication study in a larger independent population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is a genetic overlap with other psychiatric disorders, especially bipolar disorder. However, use of the case-case model in genetic analyses helps to reduce clinical heterogeneity and environmental differences between mental disorder groups [33]. The case-case model may represent a narrow subgroup of psychosis patients, more biologically correlated and hence more related to susceptibility genes than psychosis patients in general [34].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%