TheLegionella-driven PtdIns(4)Pgradient at LCV-ER membrane contact sites promotes Vap-, OSBP- and Sac1-dependent pathogen vacuole remodeling

Abstract

The causative agent of Legionnaires' disease, Legionella pneumophila, governs interactions with host cells by secreting ca. 330 different "effector" proteins. The facultative intracellular bacteria replicate in macrophages and amoeba within a unique compartment, the Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV). Hallmarks of LCV formation are the phosphoinositide (PI) lipid conversion from PtdIns(3)P to PtdIns(4)P, fusion with endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-derived vesicles and a tight association with the ER. Proteomics of purified LCVs revealed the presence of membrane contact sites (MCS) proteins implicated in lipid exchange. Using dually fluorescence-labeled Dictyostelium discoideum amoeba, we reveal that the VAMP-associated protein (Vap), the PtdIns(4)P 4-phosphatase Sac1, and the large fusion GTPase Sey1/atlastin-3 localize to the ER, but not to the LCV membrane, and that these ER-resident proteins promote intracellular replication of L. pneumophila and LCV remodeling. Moreover, oxysterol binding proteins (OSBPs) preferentially localize to the ER (OSBP8) or the LCV membrane (OSBP11), respectively, and promote (OSBP8) or restrict (OSBP11) intracellular replication of L. pneumophila and LCV expansion. Furthermore, the PtdIns(4)P-subverting L. pneumophila effectors LepB and SidC also promote LCV remodeling. Taken together, the Legionella- and host cell-driven PtdIns(4)P gradient at LCV-ER MCSs promotes Vap-, OSBP- and Sac1-dependent pathogen vacuole remodeling.

An obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen forms a direct, interkingdom membrane contact site

“…The increased appreciation of interorganelle interactions in recent years has unveiled a variety of MCSs in eukaryotes 39 . These closely apposed and tethered membranes facilitate numerous cellular processes, making them prime candidates for microbial control or mimicry 9,10 . Thus far, examples of pathogenic subversion of MCSs have been limited to interactions between eukaryotic membrane compartments [4][5][6] .…”

“…Recent research indicates that ER-mediated MCSs are susceptible to pathogen subversion 9,10 . Pathogens appear to either manipulate pre-existing MCSs 4 or establish new ones between the ER and the host-derived membrane that harbors the pathogen 6 .…”