Abstract:KlCYC1 encodes for cytochrome c in the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis and is transcribed in two mRNAs with different 3'-processing points. This is an uncommon transcription mechanism in yeast mRNAs. The 3' sequence encompassing the whole region that is needed to produce both mRNAs is analysed. We have determined identical processing points in K.lactis and in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells transformed with KlCYC1; positions 698 and 1092 (with respect to the TAA) are the major polyadenylation points. This shows that… Show more
“…The term gene sharing, first proposed for these proteins (3), may present some ambiguities, as there are cases in which a gene may encode different protein forms. In yeasts, this can be due to different sites for initiation of translation (6,7), termination (8), or splicing (9). In these cases, the corresponding protein forms also share a gene but this gene sharing is not the same as that of a single protein playing two different roles.…”
SUMMARYMoonlighting proteins are multifunctional proteins that participate in unrelated biological processes and that are not the result of gene fusion. A certain number of these proteins have been characterized in yeasts, and the easy genetic manipulation of these microorganisms has been useful for a thorough analysis of some cases of moonlighting. As the awareness of the moonlighting phenomenon has increased, a growing number of these proteins are being uncovered. In this review, we present a crop of newly identified moonlighting proteins from yeasts and discuss the experimental evidence that qualifies them to be classified as such. The variety of moonlighting functions encompassed by the proteins considered extends from control of transcription to DNA repair or binding to plasminogen. We also discuss several questions pertaining to the moonlighting condition in general. The cases presented show that yeasts are important organisms to be used as tools to understand different aspects of moonlighting proteins.
“…The term gene sharing, first proposed for these proteins (3), may present some ambiguities, as there are cases in which a gene may encode different protein forms. In yeasts, this can be due to different sites for initiation of translation (6,7), termination (8), or splicing (9). In these cases, the corresponding protein forms also share a gene but this gene sharing is not the same as that of a single protein playing two different roles.…”
SUMMARYMoonlighting proteins are multifunctional proteins that participate in unrelated biological processes and that are not the result of gene fusion. A certain number of these proteins have been characterized in yeasts, and the easy genetic manipulation of these microorganisms has been useful for a thorough analysis of some cases of moonlighting. As the awareness of the moonlighting phenomenon has increased, a growing number of these proteins are being uncovered. In this review, we present a crop of newly identified moonlighting proteins from yeasts and discuss the experimental evidence that qualifies them to be classified as such. The variety of moonlighting functions encompassed by the proteins considered extends from control of transcription to DNA repair or binding to plasminogen. We also discuss several questions pertaining to the moonlighting condition in general. The cases presented show that yeasts are important organisms to be used as tools to understand different aspects of moonlighting proteins.
“…The previous analyses showed that the KlCYC1 3´-UTR contains multiple putative processing elements but most of them do not match canonical consensus (Freire-Picos et al, 2001). In Figure 2A the RNA processing prediction output for KlCYC1 3´-UTR (S. cerevisiae mRNA 3'-processing site predictor) is shown.…”
Section: Analysis Of 3´-end Processing Elements In a Secondary Structmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Regarding the UTR length and the possibility of APA regulation, there are genes processed with regulatory alternatives. In these the alternative processing positions allow to differentiate transcripts (ie, HIS3 with 13 sites (Mahandevan et al, 1997), SUA7 with two transcripts (1.2 and 1.4) (Hoopes et al, 2000) or the two KlCYC1 (1.14 kb and 1.5 kb) (Freire-Picos et al, 2001). The genes with apparently non-regulatory alternatives are where the alternative sites are separated by as few as 10-11 nucleotides in the ACT1 transcripts (Gallwith et al, 1981) or the seven variants of YPT1 3´-end transcripts (Heidmann et al, 1992).…”
Section: Genes With Alternative Polyadenylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two KlCYC1 transcripts change their predominance along the growth phase, but not with the carbon source (Freire-Picos et al, 2001). We have shown that when the UTR is split after the first processing point, thereby separating the proximal or distal sequences, they may act as independent processing elements in both S. cerevisiae and K. lactis yeast species (Seoane et al, 2005).…”
Section: Apa Studies On Klcyc1: Cis Elements and Factors Involvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ossMUT1C-2: 5´-GTTGATAATAGAAGTAGTAGAGTTGTTAAAAAAGAAAGAAATAA TCATAAAATTTGGTATTCTTGGAATAGTAGTACATAG-3´. Plasmid pCT2 (Freire-Picos et al, 2001) was used as KlCYC1 template for the site-directed mutagenesis experiments, and as a source of wild type 3´-UTR in expression experiments.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.