2004
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/37/6/024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thek-point random matrix kernels obtained from one-point supermatrix models

Abstract: The k-point correlation functions of the Gaussian Random Matrix Ensembles are certain determinants of functions which depend on only two arguments. They are referred to as kernels, since they are the building blocks of all correlations. We show that the kernels are obtained, for arbitrary level number, directly from supermatrix models for one-point functions. More precisely, the generating functions of the one-point functions are equivalent to the kernels. This is surprising, because it implies that already th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The constant γ equals one for the real case and two for the quaternionic case. Such averages were considered before [34,24,18,35]. Here, we apply our method to show that the Pfaffian structure arises in a purely algebraic way.…”
Section: Rotation Invariant Ensembles Over Real Symmetric Matrices Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The constant γ equals one for the real case and two for the quaternionic case. Such averages were considered before [34,24,18,35]. Here, we apply our method to show that the Pfaffian structure arises in a purely algebraic way.…”
Section: Rotation Invariant Ensembles Over Real Symmetric Matrices Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.1, we notice that the Pfaffian structure arising in all those ensembles is fundamental. Particularly, on the formal level, the obvious difference between matrix ensemble probability density P matrices in the probability probability for the matrices characteristic densities g(z 1 , z 2 ) density h(z) polynomials andg(z 1 , z 2 ) real symmetric matri-P (tr H m , m ∈ N) H P (x 1 )P (x 2 )× P (x)δ(y) ces [34,24,18] H = H T = H * ×δ(y 1 )δ(y 2 )Θ(x 2 − x 1 ) circular orthogonal P (tr U m , m ∈ N) U and U † P (e ıϕ 1 )P (e ıϕ 2 )× P (e ıϕ )δ(r − 1) ensemble [4] U † U = 1 1 N and 15,40,16,41,25] τ > 0 +2ıδ (2) (z 1 − z * 2 )Θ(y 1 )] [42,43,23] exp Table 1. Particular cases of the probability densities g(z 1 , z 2 ) and h(z) and their corresponding matrix ensembles of orthogonal rotation symmetry.…”
Section: A List Of Other Matrix Ensemblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(both determinants have size d × d). By now this result has a number of different proofs and extensions, see [29], [57], [19], [20], [21], [22], [3], [18], [1], [4], [24], [31]. Formulas of this type are of interest in quantum physics and classical number theory, see [2], [28], [23], [33], [38], [39], [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the problem of computing the bulk scaling limit asymptotics of general averages (1.1.2), despite considerable interest of physicists, see e.g. Andreev-Simon [4], Gronqvist, Guhr and Kohler [37], Fyodorov [31], Szabo [54], Splttorff-Verbaarschot [52], Zirnbauer [59,60], remained open.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%