2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TheHerschelHIFI water line survey in the low-mass proto-stellar outflow L1448

Abstract: Aims. As part of the WISH (Water In Star-forming regions with Herschel) key project, systematic observations of H 2 O transitions in young outflows are being carried out with the aim of understanding the role of water in shock chemistry and its physical and dynamical properties. We report on the observations of several ortho-and para-H 2 O lines performed with the HIFI instrument toward two bright shock spots (R4 and B2) along the outflow driven by the L1448 low-mass proto-stellar system, located in the Perseu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
79
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
15
79
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast with the 3-2 line, which probes the colder entrained gas. The conclusion that H 2 O and high-J CO emission go together (but not low-J CO) is consistent with recent analyses (Santangelo et al 2012;Vasta et al 2012;Tafalla et al 2013) of WISH data at outflow positions offset from the source. The CO 10-9 line seems to be the lowest J transition whose line wings probe the warm shocked gas rather than the colder entrained outflow gas (see also Sect.…”
Section: High-j Co Vs Watersupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is in contrast with the 3-2 line, which probes the colder entrained gas. The conclusion that H 2 O and high-J CO emission go together (but not low-J CO) is consistent with recent analyses (Santangelo et al 2012;Vasta et al 2012;Tafalla et al 2013) of WISH data at outflow positions offset from the source. The CO 10-9 line seems to be the lowest J transition whose line wings probe the warm shocked gas rather than the colder entrained outflow gas (see also Sect.…”
Section: High-j Co Vs Watersupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This secondary high-velocity (HV) emission peak appears at a velocity of about +25 km s −1 and +35 km s −1 in R1 and R2. Similar variations of water line profiles with excitation were observed at the bow-shock positions along the red lobes of the L1448 (R4) and L1157 (R) outflows by Santangelo et al (2012) and Vasta et al (2012). Figure 3 presents the H 2 O 557 GHz/1097 GHz line ratio as a function of velocity for R1 and R2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In particular, the Water In Star-forming regions with Herschel (WISH, van Dishoeck et al 2011) key program has been dedicated to the study of the physical and dynamical properties of water and its role in shock chemistry. The H 2 O line profiles observed with the Heterodyne Instrument for the Far Infrared (HIFI, de Graauw et al 2010) at outflow shocks show several kinematic components along with variations with excitation energy Vasta et al 2012;Santangelo et al 2012). The observed H 2 O emission probes warm (>200 K) and very dense gas (n H 2 > ∼ 10 6 cm −3 ), which is associated with high-J CO emission (e.g Karska et al 2013;Santangelo et al 2013) and is not traced by other molecules seen from the ground, such as low-J CO and SiO (e.g., Vasta et al 2012;Nisini et al 2013;Tafalla et al 2013;Santangelo et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have proposed that this hot CO and H 2 O emission arises from low velocity, nondissociative shocks in the inner walls of the outflow cavity compressing the gas to very high thermal pressures (P/k = n T K 10 9−10 K cm −3 ). Based on the large gas compression factors and H 2 O line profiles seen toward several shock spots in bipolar outflows (far from the protostellar sources) Santangelo et al (2012) and Tafalla et al (in prep. ) conclude that current low velocity J-shocks models explain their observations better than stationary C-shocks models.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Low-mass Protostarsmentioning
confidence: 99%