2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TheHerschelGould Belt Survey in Chamaeleon II

Abstract: Context. We report on the Herschel Gould Belt survey (HGBS) of the Chamaeleon II (Cha II) star-forming region, focusing on the detection of Class I to III young stellar objects (YSOs). Aims. We aim at characterizing the circumstellar material around these YSOs and at understanding which disk parameters are most likely constrained by the new HGBS data, which are expected to be crucial for studying the transition from optically thick disks to evolved debris-type disks. Methods. We recovered 29 of the 63 known YS… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the detection bias can also affect the correlation since most other samples have worse sensitivity to disk mass compared to TWA sources because they are located at larger distances and observed with shorter exposure times. For example, the data points taken from Spezzi et al (2013) and Olofsson et al (2013) are based on the Herschel Gould Belt survey (André et al 2010) that is not sensitive enough to detect very faint disks as compared to dedicated projects like our program and the one in Harvey et al (2012a). The ambiguity of non-detections by current PACS observations may cause additional spread in F 70 and in turn weaken the M disk ∼ M relation.…”
Section: Dependence On the Stellar Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the detection bias can also affect the correlation since most other samples have worse sensitivity to disk mass compared to TWA sources because they are located at larger distances and observed with shorter exposure times. For example, the data points taken from Spezzi et al (2013) and Olofsson et al (2013) are based on the Herschel Gould Belt survey (André et al 2010) that is not sensitive enough to detect very faint disks as compared to dedicated projects like our program and the one in Harvey et al (2012a). The ambiguity of non-detections by current PACS observations may cause additional spread in F 70 and in turn weaken the M disk ∼ M relation.…”
Section: Dependence On the Stellar Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 3, we show the results from our program and from the literature (Harvey et al 2012a,b;Olofsson et al 2013;Spezzi et al 2013;Alves de Oliveira et al 2013;Riviere-Marichalar et al 2013). All fluxes are scaled assuming a distance of 100 pc.…”
Section: Dependence On the Stellar Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another recent study using Herschel observations, Spezzi et al (2013) have used a different radiative transfer code to study the disk properties of low-mass stars in the ∼2 Myr old Chamaeleon II cluster. Although their sample does not reach into the substellar regime, a few of their targets have spectral types corresponding to low masses of ∼0.3 M .…”
Section: Comparison To Other Disk Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IRAS 12500-7658 has been catalogued as a Class I object of spectral type close to K5 (Spezzi et al 2013). In this work, we detect compact submillimetre emission that is associated with this IRAS source and that is very close to a southern and extended starless core of 10 4 AU size (see Figs.…”
Section: Previously Known Ysos In the Regionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This source has been extensively studied by Spezzi et al (2013), and provides an estimation of the most probable parameters of the disk surrounding DK Cha. Spezzi et al (2013) model the SED of this source from the optical to millimetre wavelengths (using Herschel data), while the flux at 870 µm, which is expected from their set of bestfitting models, agrees very well with our measurements given in Table 2.…”
Section: Previously Known Ysos In the Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%