2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gaia-ESO Survey: Galactic evolution of lithium at high metallicity

Abstract: Context. Reconstructing the Galactic evolution of lithium (Li) is the main tool used to constrain the source(s) of Li enrichment in the Galaxy. Recent results have suggested a decline in Li at supersolar metallicities, which may indicate reduced production. Aims. We exploit the unique characteristics of the Gaia-ESO Survey open star cluster sample to further investigate this issue and to better constrain the evolution of Li at high metallicity. Methods. We trace the upper envelope of Li abundance versus metall… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
12
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results are reported in Figure 10; specifically, they very clearly demonstrated that previous claims of a Li decline at supersolar metallicities were due to selection biases in the used samples and that Li abundance in the ISM instead does not decrease at high metallicity but may actually increase. The data presented by Randich et al (2020) also suggested-for the first time-the presence of a mild trend of A(Li) with Galactocentric distance, or a shallow gradient, to be confirmed with the analysis of the full data set. Interestingly, in the last few years, Li observations in the Galactic thick disc and even Bulge have been reported (Delgado Mena et al, 2015;Bensby and Lind 2018;Fu et al, 2018;Bensby et al, 2020;Stonkutė et al, 2020).…”
Section: Lithium Be and Bsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results are reported in Figure 10; specifically, they very clearly demonstrated that previous claims of a Li decline at supersolar metallicities were due to selection biases in the used samples and that Li abundance in the ISM instead does not decrease at high metallicity but may actually increase. The data presented by Randich et al (2020) also suggested-for the first time-the presence of a mild trend of A(Li) with Galactocentric distance, or a shallow gradient, to be confirmed with the analysis of the full data set. Interestingly, in the last few years, Li observations in the Galactic thick disc and even Bulge have been reported (Delgado Mena et al, 2015;Bensby and Lind 2018;Fu et al, 2018;Bensby et al, 2020;Stonkutė et al, 2020).…”
Section: Lithium Be and Bsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Those latter suggestions were tested in a very recent paper by Randich et al (2020). They proposed the idea that Li measurements in metal-rich, young populations, that have presumably not depleted any Li and hence retain their original Li content, would allow tracing the evolution of Li in the ISM at high metallicity; to this aim, they exploited GES observations of open clusters and, specifically, of cluster members with supposedly pristine unprocessed Li, representative of the ISM value (very young PMS stars or stars on the warm side of the dip).…”
Section: Lithium Be and Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These warm stars (T eff ≥ 6800 K) show relatively constant Li abundances close to the cosmic value, indicating that they have undergone no or minimal surface Li depletion. This has been observed in open clusters and field stars with metallicities close to solar where the Li abundance of stars on the hot side of the Li-dip can reach the meteoritic value (Hobbs & Pilachowski 1986a,b;Boesgaard & Tripicco 1986, 1987Boesgaard et al 1988;Burkhart & Coupry 1989;Pasquini et al 2001;Burkhart et al 2005;Anthony-Twarog et al 2021), and in more metal-rich open clusters where even higher Li values (A(Li) > 3.4) have been derived in the same effective temperature domain (Randich et al 2020). Some exceptions deviate from the mean, namely AmFm-type stars (Burkhart et al 2005;Burkhart & Coupry 1989 which are slow rotators that present Li deficiency (by about a factor of 3) compared to normal early A and late F type stars as well as other abundance anomalies due to atomic diffusion (gravitational settling and radiative levitation; discussion in Sect.…”
Section: Looking For Stars That Might Preserve Their Original Surface LImentioning
confidence: 63%
“…1), and they always exhibit the highest Li abundances in 1 Bensby et al (2020) focus on the Galactic bulge and have only 3 stars with well-determined Li, log g 4 and −0.2 < Fe/H 0.4, and they are all cool G-type stars (T eff = 6130 K, 5732 K, and 5947 K). Randich et al (2020) for which the authors selected upper MS stars on the warm side of the Li dip (above 6500 K actually). Their Li abundances were not corrected for NLTE effects, but the authors argue that these corrections should be significantly lower than +0.1 dex.…”
Section: Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation