2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TheGaia-ESO Survey: characterisation of the [α/Fe] sequences in the Milky Way discs

Abstract: Context. High-resolution spectroscopic surveys of stars indicate that the Milky Way thin and thick discs follow different paths in the chemical space defined by [α/Fe] vs. [Fe/H], possibly suggesting different formation mechanisms for each of these structures. Aims. We investigate, using the Gaia-ESO Survey internal Data-Release 2, the properties of the double sequence of the Milky Way discs, which are defined chemically as the high-α and low-α populations. We discuss their compatibility with discs defined by… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect is more pronounced for more massive stars, but affects all elements heavier than helium roughly equally. Stars with lower initial metallicity should also have a higher ratio of α-elements to iron (Kordopatis et al 2015), so we can use the Si/Fe ratio as a function of [Fe/H] to see if the increase in frequency of compact multis is due to age or inherently low metallicity (Figure 2). At both low metallicity and high Si/Fe, none of the hosts are hot-Jupiters and an increasing fraction are compact multi-planet systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect is more pronounced for more massive stars, but affects all elements heavier than helium roughly equally. Stars with lower initial metallicity should also have a higher ratio of α-elements to iron (Kordopatis et al 2015), so we can use the Si/Fe ratio as a function of [Fe/H] to see if the increase in frequency of compact multis is due to age or inherently low metallicity (Figure 2). At both low metallicity and high Si/Fe, none of the hosts are hot-Jupiters and an increasing fraction are compact multi-planet systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stars of lower metallicity and higher Si/Fe ratios are generally older or members of the galactic thick-disk population (Kordopatis et al 2015). This could point to a changing mix of planet architectures based on formation time and location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical evolution of the Galactic components is often investigated through [X/Y]-[Fe/H] plots that give a picture of the progressive and differential enrichment of the X and Y elements and that can be used to calibrate the rate of star formation rates in the Galaxy and the yields from different progenitors (e.g., Gilmore et al 1989;Reddy et al 2006;Shen et al 2015 , it is also true that the [X/Y]-[Fe/H] distributions contain a direct information on how the differential production of the X and Y elements varied with the metallicity of the progenitors or among populations with different chemical histories (Kordopatis et al 2015;Rojas-Arriagada et al 2016;Bekki & Tsujimoto 2017). However, when studying the chemical evolution of the Galaxy, it is fundamental to bear in mind that [Fe/H] in a given population does not always increases with time (Bensby et al 2007(Bensby et al , 2014Haywood et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason is that in the [α/Fe] -[Fe/H] diagram, there is an 'intermediate-α' population lying between the thin and thick-disk populations (Edvardsson et al 1993), probably related to our orange population. This population is either split between the thin and thick disks (Kordopatis et al 2015) or simply rejected from the analyses (Hawkins et al 2015;. This becomes especially uncertain at solar metallicities, where the [α/Fe] of the two populations overlap (see discussions in e.g.…”
Section: How Does a Phylogenetic Approach Compare To Other Methods?mentioning
confidence: 99%