2012
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/203/1/4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE FERMI LARGE AREA TELESCOPE ON ORBIT: EVENT CLASSIFICATION, INSTRUMENT RESPONSE FUNCTIONS, AND CALIBRATION

Abstract: The Fermi Large Area Telescope (Fermi-LAT, hereafter LAT), the primary instrument on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope (Fermi) mission, is an imaging, wide field-of-view, high-energy γ -ray telescope, covering the energy range from 20 MeV to more than 300 GeV. During the first years of the mission, the LAT team has gained considerable insight into the in-flight performance of the instrument. Accordingly, we have updated the analysis used to reduce LAT data for public release as well as the instrument respons… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
421
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 482 publications
(430 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
421
2
Order By: Relevance
“…20 We used binned likelihood analysis with the gtlike tool for the light curves and for the average spectral results. Systematic uncertainties can be estimated as ∼8% for the fluxes and ∼0.1 for the spectral slopes (Ackermann et al 2012). …”
Section: Lat Observations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 We used binned likelihood analysis with the gtlike tool for the light curves and for the average spectral results. Systematic uncertainties can be estimated as ∼8% for the fluxes and ∼0.1 for the spectral slopes (Ackermann et al 2012). …”
Section: Lat Observations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data set was produced with the so-called Pass 7 reprocessed (P7REP) version of the event analysis and selection criteria, which takes into account effects measured in flight that were not considered in pre-launch performance estimates, such as pile-up and accidental coincidence effects in the detector subsystems (Ackermann et al 2012a), and updated calibration constants, to include effects such as the degradation in the calorimeter light yield (Bregeon et al 2013). SOURCE class events were used in this work, excluding those coming from zenith angles larger than 100 • or detected when the rocking angle of the satellite was larger than 52 • to reduce contamination by atmospheric γ-rays from the Earth.…”
Section: Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inferred properties of the sources may also be affected by uncertainties in the characterisation of the LAT instrument. According to Ackermann et al (2012a), the magnitude of the systematic error arising from uncertainties in the effective area, point spread function, and energy dispersion, is about 0.1 on the spectral index and about 10% on the photon and energy fluxes (for the analysis of a not-too-hard point source in the 0.1−100 GeV range). These systematic uncertainties are therefore of the same order as the statistical uncertainties on spectral indices and fluxes for the three brightest point sources in the LMC.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We checked that the inclusion of a larger number of sources to the fit did not significantly affect the derived light curve, resulting only in minor changes of the flux estimates. In this way, we extracted the source fluxes in the 0.1−510 GeV energy band (the maximal energy is set by the maximal energy considered in the Pass 7 Instrument Response Functions, Ackermann et al 2012). We estimated the significance of detection in each time bin using the test statistic value (TS, Mattox et al 1996), obtained from the fit.…”
Section: Fermi/lat Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%