2015
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The e-Incubator: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Compatible Mini Incubator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Komlev et al (2009) applied an advanced X-ray technique, pseudo-holotomography, to simultaneously visualize trabecular mineralized bone and soft tissue including vascular networks with vessels resolved down to 15mm in diameter. The integration of MRI imaging with a sophisticated perfusion bioreactor was demonstrated, showing its potential for non-invasive monitoring of tissue development (Othman et al, 2014); however, there remain concerns regarding the continuous or frequent exposure of cells to powerful magnetic fields (McLeod and Collazo, 2000). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful alternative to mCT, and has the advantage of not exposing the tissue to ionizing radiation (Murphy and Atala, 2014).…”
Section: Experimental Testing and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Komlev et al (2009) applied an advanced X-ray technique, pseudo-holotomography, to simultaneously visualize trabecular mineralized bone and soft tissue including vascular networks with vessels resolved down to 15mm in diameter. The integration of MRI imaging with a sophisticated perfusion bioreactor was demonstrated, showing its potential for non-invasive monitoring of tissue development (Othman et al, 2014); however, there remain concerns regarding the continuous or frequent exposure of cells to powerful magnetic fields (McLeod and Collazo, 2000). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful alternative to mCT, and has the advantage of not exposing the tissue to ionizing radiation (Murphy and Atala, 2014).…”
Section: Experimental Testing and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3C). A number of controls are often in place to maintain pH, temperature, dissolved O 2 and CO 2 content (Bartnikowski et al, 2014;Kim and Ma, 2012a;Othman et al, 2014;Zhao et al, 2007). Designs should ensure fluid flow is channeled through the body of the scaffold rather than taking a less restrictive path between the outside of the scaffold and culture chamber walls .…”
Section: Perfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, NMR is ideal for in situ based measurements and dynamic systems where the pore space changes with time. 8,9 However, the maximum diffusion time, D, that can be measured using traditional diffusion-NMR methods, such as the pulsed-gradient spin echo (PGSE) and stimulated echo (PGSTE) experiments, is determined by the relaxation time of the associated spin order that has been prepared; T 2 in PGSE and T 1 in PGSTE. Consequently, there is an upper limit on the pore sizes that can be explored using these traditional methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%