1957
DOI: 10.1139/v57-106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hysteresis Loop in Adsorption Isotherms on Porous Vycor Glass and Associated Dimensional Changes of the Adsorbent. Ii

Abstract: The causes of hysteresis in the adsorption isotherms on porous Vycor glass are discussed, employing as ancillary evidence the dimensional changes of the adsorbent. Diagrams of domain complexions for pores of the ink-bottle type are given and used to develop certain of Everett's theorems. Evidence showing the interdependence of domains or voids is given. The compressibility of the porous adsorbent is evaluated and shown to differ with different adsorbates, which suggests distributions of adsorbed matter specifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 (water at 18.75 o C) together with those of Ref. 22 (butane at −6.2 o C), we find that along the reversible region at the top of the hysteresis loop, the relationship (∆l/l) vs ln(P/P 0 ) is practically linear but the slope is only 1.9 times higher for water than for butane. This leads to an embarrassing result: the K value is found to depend markedly on the adsorbate: it is 3 times higher for water than for butane.…”
Section: Ii-hysteresis Regionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5 (water at 18.75 o C) together with those of Ref. 22 (butane at −6.2 o C), we find that along the reversible region at the top of the hysteresis loop, the relationship (∆l/l) vs ln(P/P 0 ) is practically linear but the slope is only 1.9 times higher for water than for butane. This leads to an embarrassing result: the K value is found to depend markedly on the adsorbate: it is 3 times higher for water than for butane.…”
Section: Ii-hysteresis Regionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…(4), contrary to what has been assumed in all the papers where the deformation of the solid has been taken into account. 21,22,23 Actually, as is shown below, the shift (µ σ − µ v ) is small, but even small it cannot be ignored if we want to treat consistently the influence of the elastic deformation on adsorption. Then, for isothermal conditions, F σ can be written as…”
Section: I-reversible Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, the solid matrix has to oppose the forces produced by the negative pressure and will be compressed. This latter contraction was measured by Quinn & McIntosh (1957) and is typically quite small (less than 0.2%). Schechter et at.…”
Section: Maximum Amount Adsorbedmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Despite this, direct measurements of adsorptive deformation essentially are not conducted nowadays. Only measurements of structural characteristics of clay minerals [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], polymeric materials [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], carbons [1,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], zeolites [27,28], and porous glasses [29,30] are performed. Moreover, no calculations of thermodynamic characteristics of a noninert adsorbent in the process of its deformation are performed (rare exceptions are [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%