2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hypomania Checklist (HCL) — Systematic review of its properties to screen for bipolar disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, this definition of hypomanic symptoms, which includes severity, impairment and duration criteria, is more conservative than several other studies, which have tended to use only the threshold score of 14 (Hardoy et al 2005;Meyer et al 2007Meyer et al , 2014. We chose a duration criterion of 2-3 days or more because the 4-day threshold within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) excludes many individuals with bipolar disorder type II (Goldberg et al 2009;Bauer et al 2011;Parker et al 2014), and because 2 days is known to be the modal duration of hypomania in bipolar II disorder (Benazzi, 2001;Angst & Cassano, 2005).…”
Section: Assessment Of Hypomanic Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, this definition of hypomanic symptoms, which includes severity, impairment and duration criteria, is more conservative than several other studies, which have tended to use only the threshold score of 14 (Hardoy et al 2005;Meyer et al 2007Meyer et al , 2014. We chose a duration criterion of 2-3 days or more because the 4-day threshold within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) excludes many individuals with bipolar disorder type II (Goldberg et al 2009;Bauer et al 2011;Parker et al 2014), and because 2 days is known to be the modal duration of hypomania in bipolar II disorder (Benazzi, 2001;Angst & Cassano, 2005).…”
Section: Assessment Of Hypomanic Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 9,359 participants were invited to complete the HCL-32, of whom 3,448 (37%) returned the questionnaire. The HCL-32 has been used extensively in clinical and non-clinical settings and is validated as a screening tool for BD type II (Angst et al, 2011;Forty et al, 2009;Holtmann et al, 2009;Meyer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Hypomaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this instrument is well validated as a screening tool for bipolar disorder type II. [26,27] It is also possible that respondents completed the HCL-32 with reference to a period of intoxication with recreational drugs, even though the opening statement specifically asks that they consider "a period when [they] were in a high state, not related to recreational drug use". There have not yet been sensitivity and specificity tests of the HCL-32 as a categorical measure which includes both duration and impact on functioning as criteria but it is likely that by including these features we improve sensitivity for a diagnosis of hypomania (previous methods have tended to focus solely on a threshold score on the HCL-32, usually 14 out of 32).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%