2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.0740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Meta-Analysis Might Have a Weight Problem—Reply

Abstract: ment of the orbit. In this case, CT scan revealed a large right supra agger frontal cell and lateralized right middle turbinate, which resulted in obstruction of the right frontal sinus, leading to frontal sinus atelectasis. This produced an attenuation and bowing of the right superior orbital wall into the right frontal sinus.To our knowledge, there is only 1 case of frontal SSS reported in the literature. 6 Our case shared similarities with that of Naik et al, 6 where both patients had an obstructing supra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major shortcoming was that most of its overall effects were predominantly driven by the over weighting of Khater et al, an RCT with a total of only 22 participants, resulting in an unconvincing clinical conclusion. In a letter in reply, the authors maintain the validity of their conclusion after excluding Khater et al Their justification was given that the remaining 2 studies were also short of data consistency: the proportion of patients showing a hearing gain of 10 dB or greater was 81.7% (25 of 30 patients) in the control group of Cho et al compared with 28.6% (6 of 21) in the control group of Krajčovičová et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major shortcoming was that most of its overall effects were predominantly driven by the over weighting of Khater et al, an RCT with a total of only 22 participants, resulting in an unconvincing clinical conclusion. In a letter in reply, the authors maintain the validity of their conclusion after excluding Khater et al Their justification was given that the remaining 2 studies were also short of data consistency: the proportion of patients showing a hearing gain of 10 dB or greater was 81.7% (25 of 30 patients) in the control group of Cho et al compared with 28.6% (6 of 21) in the control group of Krajčovičová et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%