2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(00)90486-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hydroxyapatite-ABG hip system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern of remodelling produced by this anatomic cementless stem was similar to those shown by other second-generation cemented stems, with a decrease of bone mass ranged between 20% and 25% in proximal areas, 5% and 15% in intermediate areas and with no significant loss in distal areas (Tonino et al, 2000;Gibbons et al, 2001;Ka¨rrholm et al, 2002). It was also shown in these studies that the changes remained stable after the first or second year of the operation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The pattern of remodelling produced by this anatomic cementless stem was similar to those shown by other second-generation cemented stems, with a decrease of bone mass ranged between 20% and 25% in proximal areas, 5% and 15% in intermediate areas and with no significant loss in distal areas (Tonino et al, 2000;Gibbons et al, 2001;Ka¨rrholm et al, 2002). It was also shown in these studies that the changes remained stable after the first or second year of the operation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This was seen in 97.3% of the patients after 5 years, while only 1.4% of the patients had moderate lateral thigh pain. Although this result is only slightly better than other contemporary implants based on the same philosophy [8, 26, 27, 3335], it is clearly superior to older designs that follow different philosophies [36, 37]. This may be related to the distal geometry with posterior chamfer to prevent stem tip impingement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In this case, the retrieved HA‐coated implants revealed a bone contact ratio of 87.5% (corresponding tooth 36) and 97.4% (corresponding tooth 37), respectively. Favorable long‐term clinical results obtained with HA‐coated implants could also be demonstrated in orthopedic studies (Tonino & Rahmy 2000; Geesink 2002) and in studies using HA as an onlay bone graft material in the mandible and maxilla (Hjorting‐Hansen et al 1990; Nunes et al 1997; Proussaefs et al 2002). Therefore, when comparing the results of HA‐coated implants with those of titanium implants, it may be worth specifying the surface type of titanium implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%