2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hydrophobin-Like OmSSP1 May Be an Effector in the Ericoid Mycorrhizal Symbiosis

Abstract: Mutualistic and pathogenic plant-colonizing fungi use effector molecules to manipulate the host cell metabolism to allow plant tissue invasion. Some small secreted proteins (SSPs) have been identified as fungal effectors in both ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, but it is currently unknown whether SSPs also play a role as effectors in other mycorrhizal associations. Ericoid mycorrhiza is a specific endomycorrhizal type that involves symbiotic fungi mostly belonging to the Leotiomycetes (Ascomyc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EffHunter predicted a similar number of effectors in ectomycorrhizal as in white and brown rots. In congruence with these findings, recent literature evidences that small-secreted effectors participate in all types of microbial interactions, and the concept "effector" seems to be rapidly evolving [67][68][69][70][71][72]. In Figure 3, the graphic shows the number of effectors predicted in different types of fungi: yeast, brown and white rot fungi, ectomycorrhiza, opportunistic, mycoparasites, human pathogens, plant pathogens, entomopathogens and saprotrophs (Supplementary Table S4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…EffHunter predicted a similar number of effectors in ectomycorrhizal as in white and brown rots. In congruence with these findings, recent literature evidences that small-secreted effectors participate in all types of microbial interactions, and the concept "effector" seems to be rapidly evolving [67][68][69][70][71][72]. In Figure 3, the graphic shows the number of effectors predicted in different types of fungi: yeast, brown and white rot fungi, ectomycorrhiza, opportunistic, mycoparasites, human pathogens, plant pathogens, entomopathogens and saprotrophs (Supplementary Table S4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Germlings from Fgr mutants lacking FgHyd3 bind poorly to hydrophobic surfaces, such as plant leaves, and are not as infectious [55]. Other fungal hydrophobins have effector activity [56,57], hence it is possible that FgHyd3 also has effector activity, but this needs to be confirmed experimentally. The observation that FgHyd3 was exclusive to the EV samples suggests that EVs function as an unconventional secretion mechanism for some classes of protein effectors, that EVs could transport FgHyd3 to other areas of the plant, or that EVs shield it from early recognition by the plant's defenses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remainder were poorly characterized with only a general function predicted. Other than the aforementioned tubulin genes, this shortlist did not contain any of the transcripts typically considered housekeeping genes, nor those previously suggested for use as reference genes in qPCR of O. maius (46)(47)(48)(49). This absence of typical housekeeping genes supports the need to validate reference genes in the context of each experimental system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%