2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10009-005-0211-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The HybridUML profile for UML 2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Axelsson [9] observed that UML cannot describe the continuous-time relationships and thus proposed an UML extension with stereotypes to represent features like continuous variables, equations, time, and derivatives. A similar work has been conducted by Berkenkötter et al [10], where the authors extended UML based on a programming language suitable for hybrid systems. Nevertheless, both works do not focus on representing dataflow behavior.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Axelsson [9] observed that UML cannot describe the continuous-time relationships and thus proposed an UML extension with stereotypes to represent features like continuous variables, equations, time, and derivatives. A similar work has been conducted by Berkenkötter et al [10], where the authors extended UML based on a programming language suitable for hybrid systems. Nevertheless, both works do not focus on representing dataflow behavior.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Their main contribution is to use UML2.0 profile to extend UML as HybridUML allowing to label transitions with conditions, assignments and signals. The semantics of executable HybridUML is more easily adapted to syntactic extensions and all models are automatically executable [10,11]. However, they didn't consider the behavior of system's component.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to bond graphs' low level of practical usage, they are not considered in this article. The same applies to other efforts based on less widely used simulation languages [Berkenkotter et al, 2006].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%