The hybrid model of attentional control: New insights into hemispheric asymmetries inferred from TMS research

Abstract

Several competing theories on the mechanisms underlying attentional control have emerged over the years that, despite their substantial differences, all emphasize the importance of hemispheric asymmetries. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has proven particularly successful in teasing them apart by selective perturbation of the dorsal and ventral fronto-parietal network. We here critically review the TMS literature and show that hemispheric asymmetries within the dorsal attention network differ between parietal and frontal cortex. Specifically, posterior parietal cortex seems to be characterized by a contralateral bias of each hemisphere and competition between them. In contrast, the right frontal eye field seems to be involved in shifting attention toward both hemifields, whereas left frontal eye field is only involved on shifting attention toward the contralateral hemifield. In the light of presented evidence, we propose to revise the functional-anatomical model originally proposed by Corbetta and Shulman (2011, 2002) and introduce a hybrid model of hemispheric asymmetries in attentional control.

Laterality of Attentional Networks in Patients With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

“…The LH only controls attention toward the right visual field, whereas the RH is capable of controlling attention toward both sides of the visual fields. This theory has also been confirmed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (Duecker et al, 2013;Duecker and Sack, 2015). Some studies also suggest that attention function is lateralized in two cerebral hemispheres (Mesulam, 1999;Brooks et al, 2014).…”

Hemispheric asymmetry: Looking for a novel signature of the modulation of spatial attention in multisensory processing

“…The first two are neural models based on lateralization and interactions between the two hemispheres. These two models still need further evidence to verify whether one of them is more comprehensive, or whether instead they operate hierarchically (e.g., Duecker & Sack, 2015; Scolari, Seidl-Rathkopf, & Kastner, 2015). The third model provides an ecological perspective, according to which the biasing of people’s spatial attention toward the right results from an adaptation to their interaction with the outside world.…”

Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on attention: Current debates, cognitive studies and novel clinical applications

“…TMS has proven particularly successful in teasing their relative roles apart, as it allows a selective perturbation of the dorsal and ventral fronto-parietal network. In their article (Duecker and Sack, 2015) first review the TMS literature with respect to hemispheric asymmetries within the dorsal attention network. They then discuss the relative contributions of the Heilman and Kinsbourne attention models.…”