2002
DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.0000027414.34728.1f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hunt for Nutritional and Pharmacological Modulators of Paraoxonase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
35
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[33][34][35][36] Our finding that PON1 activity was a stronger prognostic factor in the men at highest risk of a new CHD event, either because they already had clinical evidence of CHD or because other risk factors clustered in them as indicated by the Framingham risk equation, is consistent with several case-control studies in which low PON1 activity or PON1 polymorphisms associated with low activity have been reported to be more prevalent in patients at increased risk by virtue of other risk factors such as age, cigarette smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. 21,37 It suggests that, were it possible to increase PON1 activity by a nutritional or pharmacological intervention, 37 the adverse effect of some of other risk factors might be ameliorated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[33][34][35][36] Our finding that PON1 activity was a stronger prognostic factor in the men at highest risk of a new CHD event, either because they already had clinical evidence of CHD or because other risk factors clustered in them as indicated by the Framingham risk equation, is consistent with several case-control studies in which low PON1 activity or PON1 polymorphisms associated with low activity have been reported to be more prevalent in patients at increased risk by virtue of other risk factors such as age, cigarette smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. 21,37 It suggests that, were it possible to increase PON1 activity by a nutritional or pharmacological intervention, 37 the adverse effect of some of other risk factors might be ameliorated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The lipid composition of HDL, which is open to nutritional or pharmacological modification, may provide a means of modifying PON1 activity favorably. Furthermore, there may be opportunities to increase the expression of PON1 activity by nutritional or pharmacological effects on its genetic regulation 37 now that promoter polymorphisms of PON1 have been reported to be associated with early onset CHD. 38 Serum clusterin, which is present in the same HDL subspecies as PON1, did not predict new CHD events in this study, nor was it related to the presence of CHD in our previous case-control study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on interactions between genetic and nutritional components is particularly interesting, and attempts are being made to find modulators of serum PON1 activity for therapeutic purposes (9 ). However, because most of the conclusions reported to date have been the result of experimental investigations or intervention studies with patients, it is still unclear how nutritional or other environmental agents affect PON1 activity in the general population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While preserved PON1 activity has been found in HDL-deficient states (14,33,34), in our patient, PON1 activity was reduced 78% compared with the healthy control subjects (Table III). The interindividual variability in serum PON1 activity seems to be regulated by genetic SNPs, environmental (tobacco, alcohol, fatty acids) (35) and biochemical (HDL-C and total cholesterol levels) (36) factors that may increase or reduce PON1 activity, which may explain the low activity found in the proband and some of the family members. While ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux to total isolated HDL was preserved in mutation carriers (Table III), SRB1-mediated efflux to total isolated HDL was reduced ~50% in the proband relative to the efflux of the healthy control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%