2005
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2005.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The humanID gait challenge problem: data sets, performance, and analysis

Abstract: Identification of people by analysis of gait patterns extracted from video has recently become a popular research problem. However, the conditions under which the problem is "solvable" are not understood or characterized. To provide a means for measuring progress and characterizing the properties of gait recognition, we introduce the HumanID Gait Challenge Problem. The challenge problem consists of a baseline algorithm, a set of 12 experiments, and a large data set. The baseline algorithm estimates silhouettes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
770
2
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,002 publications
(794 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
770
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the temporal alignment is necessary for the other methods, their computational cost is higher than that of the Amplitude method. Second, we tested our method by using a database of gait image sequence from University of South Florida; for details of the database, refer to [12]. The database consists of gallery (watch-list) and probe (input data) image sequences, which are compared in the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the temporal alignment is necessary for the other methods, their computational cost is higher than that of the Amplitude method. Second, we tested our method by using a database of gait image sequence from University of South Florida; for details of the database, refer to [12]. The database consists of gallery (watch-list) and probe (input data) image sequences, which are compared in the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of images we use is normalized to 88 × 128 pixels, and the number of frames for matching is 128. We compared three methods, Amplitude, No DC and Baseline [12]. Figure 13 shows identification and verification rates for each probe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3(j)-(k)). The boundary of a silhouette is obtained by the application of Hp-Gf using D approximately in the range [18,22] for the USF dataset [22]. Since the silhouette boundary corresponds to the sharpest image, e.g., Fig.…”
Section: Cut-off Frequency Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, [4,20] is considered to be the ideal range of cut-off frequencies. focus value in the range [22,0]. Fig.…”
Section: Cut-off Frequency Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%