Alu and L1 are families of non-LTR retrotransposons representing Ϸ30% of the human genome. Genomic distributions of young Alu and L1 elements are quite similar, but over time, Alu densities in GC-rich DNA increase in comparison with L1 densities. Here we analyze two processes that may contribute to this phenomenon. First, DNA duplications in the human genome occur more frequently in Alu-and GC-rich than in AT-rich chromosomal regions. Second, most Alu elements tend to be coclustered with each other, but recently retroposed elements are likely to be inserted outside the existing clusters. These ''stand-alone'' elements appear to be rapidly eliminated from the genome. We also report that over time, the densities of recently retroposed Alu families on chromosome Y decline rapidly, whereas Alu densities on chromosome X increase relative to autosomal densities. We propose that these changes in the chromosomal proportions of Alu densities and the elimination of stand-alone Alus represent the same process of paternal Alu selection. We also propose that long-term Alu accumulation in GC-rich DNA is associated with DNA duplication initiated by elevated recombinogenic activities in Alu clusters.A lu and L1 are families of non-LTR retrotransposons that have been actively retroposed throughout the evolutionary history of primates (1-3) and together contributed Ϸ30% of the DNA in the human genome (4). Both Alu and L1 elements are transcribed from a limited number of active source genes, reverse transcribed, and integrated to host DNA. The retroposed elements form subfamilies that share characteristic features with their source genes. The Alu source genes are Ϸ300 bp long and GC-rich, whereas L1 source genes are 6-7 kb long and AT-rich. Alu retrotransposition depends on reverse transcriptase encoded by active L1 retroelements (5-9), but the overall chromosomal distributions of Alu and L1 elements are quite different (10-12). L1s tend to be preserved in AT-rich DNA, whereas Alu are more abundant in GC-rich DNA. No standard biological mechanism has so far been able to explain this difference in the retroelement distribution (13,14).It has been shown recently that the chromosomal distributions of young Alu and L1 elements initially resemble each other but, unlike L1, the Alu distribution shifts toward GC-rich DNA over time (4). Based on this GC bias, it has been proposed that originally Alu elements are inserted relatively randomly throughout the genome but over time, they accumulate in GC-rich DNA (4, 15). The accumulation is particularly active for younger Alu, Ͻ5 million years (Myrs) old, but the mechanism of this process involving positive Alu selection in gene-rich regions appears to be controversial (4,16,17).In this paper, we discuss Alu-mediated DNA duplication and selection against young Alus as two basic processes that might have contributed to the postinsertional evolution of Alu distribution. DNA duplications, also known as segmental duplications or low copy repeats, represent Ϸ5% of the human genome and have been stu...