1989
DOI: 10.1210/endo-125-4-2167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Human Liver Growth Hormone Receptor*

Abstract: Human livers, obtained from donors at the time of transplant, were homogenized in 0.25 M sucrose and fractionated by differential centrifugation. The specific binding of [125I] human (h) GH to total particulate fractions from 18 livers varied from 0.4-5.1% of the total radioactivity/100 micrograms protein. Binding affinity was 2.0 +/- 0.3 X 10(9) M-1, and binding capacity ranged from 14-53 fmol/mg protein. A different proportion of receptors occupied by endogenous hGH did not explain the large variation in bin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
14
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specificity and affinity of the human wild-type GHR expressed in 293 cells were those expected for a human receptor (Hocquette et al 1989). The binding affinity of the D152H receptor was similar to the wild-type GHR, whereas the number of receptors expressed in 293 cells, whatever the amount of cDNA transfected, was lower for the mutant than for the wild-type GHR.…”
Section: Effects Of the Mutation On The Ghr Dimer Structurementioning
confidence: 61%
“…Specificity and affinity of the human wild-type GHR expressed in 293 cells were those expected for a human receptor (Hocquette et al 1989). The binding affinity of the D152H receptor was similar to the wild-type GHR, whereas the number of receptors expressed in 293 cells, whatever the amount of cDNA transfected, was lower for the mutant than for the wild-type GHR.…”
Section: Effects Of the Mutation On The Ghr Dimer Structurementioning
confidence: 61%
“…The molecular masses of the full-length receptor and of the BP, 88,000 and 38,000, respectively, are those expected for the two forms (23 (7), who found GH binding activity in a lysosomal fraction prepared from COS-7 cells expressing the mutant hGH receptor. The distribution of the hGH receptor that was presented by these authors and that lead them to conclude that there was an abnormal processing of the mutant receptor is difficult to reconcile with respect to previous studies (24,25). Their results showing the complete absence of wild type hGH receptors in a microsomal fraction make the interpretation of their binding studies difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In the present study, we asked whether there are factors other than the levels of hGHR, which may be responsible for the decreased responsiveness to hGH in fetal tissues. We focused on Based on its amino acid sequence, the nascent hGHR is predicted to be w70 kDa in size while, when resolved on SDS-PAGE gels under reducing conditions, the mature hGHR migrates at 100-140 kDa (Hocquette et al 1989, Alele et al 1998, Zhang et al 2001, Cowan et al 2005. These differences are due primarily to the presence of five asparagine-linked glycosylation sites within the extracellular domain, a variable number of which are glycosylated in the mature hGHR (Harding et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%