“…Flin et al, 1996; Mearns and Flin, 1995; Tharaldsen et al, 2008; see also Sjoberg et al, 2004). British and Norwegian studies have aimed to clarify the main dimensions of risk perception (Adie et al, 2005; Flin et al, 1996; Rundmo, 1992a; Rundmo and Sjoberg, 1996; Tharaldsen et al, 2008; see Safari, 2001, for Australian data), investigated its links with risk behaviour (Fleming et al, 1995; Mearns and Flin, 1995; Rundmo, 1992b, 1996; Rundmo and Sjoberg, 1996), compared employees’ risk perception with quantitative risk assessment (QRA) and/or accident records (Flin et al, 1996; Mearns and Flin, 1995; Mearns et al, 2003; Rundmo, 1992b), and compared the risk perception of British, Danish and Norwegian workers (Fleming et al, 1995; Rasmussen and Tharaldsen, 2012). Findings have been broadly consistent.…”