2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The human CMV-UL86 peptide 981–1003 shares a crossreactive T-cell epitope with the encephalitogenic MOG peptide 34–56, but lacks the capacity to induce EAE in rhesus monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of T cells has been found in humans in the repertoire of effector memory T cells that keep chronic latent infection with CMV under control (Pietra et al, 2003). Interestingly, we also found that the MOG40-48 epitope shares high sequence similarity with a peptide encoded in the UL86 ORF of human CMV and that T cells raised against the CMV peptide crossreact with MOG34-56 (Brok et al, 2007). As marmosets are naturally infected with a human CMV-related β-herpesvirus, it is tempting to speculate that the effector memory T cells that cause MS-like disease in marmosets immunized with MOG34-56/IFA originate from the anti-CMV repertoire.…”
Section: Modeling the T Cell Response To Injurysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This type of T cells has been found in humans in the repertoire of effector memory T cells that keep chronic latent infection with CMV under control (Pietra et al, 2003). Interestingly, we also found that the MOG40-48 epitope shares high sequence similarity with a peptide encoded in the UL86 ORF of human CMV and that T cells raised against the CMV peptide crossreact with MOG34-56 (Brok et al, 2007). As marmosets are naturally infected with a human CMV-related β-herpesvirus, it is tempting to speculate that the effector memory T cells that cause MS-like disease in marmosets immunized with MOG34-56/IFA originate from the anti-CMV repertoire.…”
Section: Modeling the T Cell Response To Injurysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Numbers in the panels represent the time points (psd) when overt neurological signs were first observed. susceptible to EAE than marmosets (25). In the third monkey (M03027), EAE scores fluctuating between 0.5 and 1.0 were recorded from psd 50 onwards.…”
Section: Experiments Bmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Three monkeys were withdrawn from their respective experiments without neurological impairment. One monkey (QK) had experienced serious body weight loss and was sacrificed preterm to avoid a sudden deterioration of the clinical state, as has been observed in rhesus monkeys in which immunization with MOG 34 -56 induced acute onset EAE (25). Two monkeys (Mi020 and Mi021) were sacrificed with mild signs of EAE (score 0.5) as they reached the end of the experiment.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical signs were scored daily by observers blinded to the treatment, using a previously described semiquantitative scale (27,31,32): 0 = no clinical signs; 0.5 = loss of appetite, vomiting; 1 = substantial reduction of general condition; 2 = ataxia, sensory loss, and/or visual problems; 2.5 = incomplete paralysis of one (hemiparesis) or both sides (paraparesis); 3 = complete paralysis of one (hemiplegia) or both sides (paraplegia); 4 = complete paralysis (quadriplegia); 5 = moribund. The rhMOG-induced EAE model in rhesus monkeys is characterized by acute onset and rapid disease progression, with the monkeys reaching a moribund state within 24 h. To avoid suffering, monkeys were euthanized at EAE score $ 2.5, or at score 2 when the animal was not expected to survive until the next day.…”
Section: Eae Induction and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%