2017
DOI: 10.1177/0170840616686129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Human Capital Hoax: Work, Debt and Insecurity in the Era of Uberization

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. This essay argues the opposite. Human capital theory implies that employees should bear the costs (and benefits) of their investment. Highly individualized training and work practices are an inevitable corollary. Self-employment, portfolio careers, the 'gig economy' and ondemand business models (including Uber and Deliveroo) faithfully reflect the assumptions that inform human capital theory. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
230
0
37

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
230
0
37
Order By: Relevance
“…The public outrage was swift, with commentary pointing out the irony of such a remark from the CEO of a company currently beset with several scandals, including corporate sexual harassment scandals and strike-breaking, all on top of a business model rooted in worker precarity. As Fleming (2017) has recently pointed out, workers are pushing back against what he calls the "human capital hoax," in which a model of self-interested individualism frames economic failure as a purely individual responsibility. Uber drivers, for example, have begun collectively organizing to be recognized as employees rather than "independent contractors.…”
Section: Questions and Provocations: The Future Of Resistance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The public outrage was swift, with commentary pointing out the irony of such a remark from the CEO of a company currently beset with several scandals, including corporate sexual harassment scandals and strike-breaking, all on top of a business model rooted in worker precarity. As Fleming (2017) has recently pointed out, workers are pushing back against what he calls the "human capital hoax," in which a model of self-interested individualism frames economic failure as a purely individual responsibility. Uber drivers, for example, have begun collectively organizing to be recognized as employees rather than "independent contractors.…”
Section: Questions and Provocations: The Future Of Resistance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, this generally and economically-centered accepted human capital theory has been aimed at the individualization of work organizations, a situation that in the present times of Uberisation can have different consequences that are not always good for workers, such as involuntary self-employment, job insecurity, and personal debt [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changing nature of work has been approached through various sub‐disciplinary angles within the management literature, each contributing to different debates and questions surrounding new work practices. Research in organizational behaviour has, for instance, looked at employee motivation and the psychological implications of new work practices (Putnam et al ., ; see Spreitzer et al ., , for a thorough review on organizational behaviour research on the new world of work), while research in organization studies has been more concerned with the themes of identity, resistance and power (see Barley et al ., ; Fleming, ; Selenko et al ., ). Commitment, career management and flexible work arrangements have been recurrent themes in the human resource management literature (e.g.…”
Section: Conceptual and Methodsological Considerations In The Study Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%