2016
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Human Brainnetome Atlas: A New Brain Atlas Based on Connectional Architecture

Abstract: The human brain atlases that allow correlating brain anatomy with psychological and cognitive functions are in transition from ex vivo histology-based printed atlases to digital brain maps providing multimodal in vivo information. Many current human brain atlases cover only specific structures, lack fine-grained parcellations, and fail to provide functionally important connectivity information. Using noninvasive multimodal neuroimaging techniques, we designed a connectivity-based parcellation framework that id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

30
2,047
1
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,227 publications
(2,085 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
30
2,047
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The brain volume of each subject was divided into 246 nonoverlapping anatomical regions of interest (ROIs) according to the Brainnetome Atlas [23]. Thirty regions from the most ventral part of the brain not acquired during scans were discarded and are not included in the following analysis.…”
Section: Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brain volume of each subject was divided into 246 nonoverlapping anatomical regions of interest (ROIs) according to the Brainnetome Atlas [23]. Thirty regions from the most ventral part of the brain not acquired during scans were discarded and are not included in the following analysis.…”
Section: Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fan et al. (2016) designed a connectivity‐based parcellation framework that identifies the subdivisions of the entire human brain which named CC subregions but the description was a few. Glasser et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although diffusion MRI data is quite different from resting-state fMRI data, the clustering algorithms could be implemented similarly once connectivity is defined. For example, K-means (Johansen-Berg et al, 2004; Klein et al, 2007), spectral clustering (Venkataraman et al, 2009; Fan et al, 2014, 2016; Zhang et al, 2014), hierarchical clustering (Gorbach et al, 2011; Moreno-Dominguez et al, 2014), and some other clustering algorithms (Behrens et al, 2003; Jbabdi et al, 2009) are applied to perform structural connectivity-based parcellation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%