2012
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01036.2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The human brain representation of odor identification

Abstract: Kjelvik G, Evensmoen HR, Brezova V, Håberg AK. The human brain representation of odor identification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
56
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
9
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, due to the heterogeneity of methods used across the studies the interpretation and comparison of results from these experiments is often difficult4567891011121314151617. Furthermore, many results support the idea that the neural correlates of odor processing are strongly task dependent, involving a distributed network of structures - even outside olfactory core regions - determined by the nature of the context and of the olfactory and sensory task17.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, due to the heterogeneity of methods used across the studies the interpretation and comparison of results from these experiments is often difficult4567891011121314151617. Furthermore, many results support the idea that the neural correlates of odor processing are strongly task dependent, involving a distributed network of structures - even outside olfactory core regions - determined by the nature of the context and of the olfactory and sensory task17.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge there is a noteworthy lack of investigation of olfaction neural correlates in resting-state by using FDG-PET/CT. In fact, in the majority of imaging studies the neural correlates of olfactory stimulation have been indirectly related to cerebral blood flow using techniques as fMRI and H 2 15 O-PET45678, being in the latter compulsory the presence of an in-house cyclotron along with a complicated and sensitive methodology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feedback originates from the same class of layer II/III neurons whose axons form the perforant path projection to the hippocampal formation (Agster and Burwell, 2009), whereas entorhinal cortex output to other, nonolfactory areas is predominantly from layer V pyramidal neurons. The LEC is responsive to objects (perhaps odorous) in an open field (Deshmukh and Knierim, 2011), and to odors (Boeijinga and Lopes da Silva, 1989;Eeckman and Freeman, 1990; Kay and Freeman, 1998; Chabaud et al, 2000; Kjelvik et al, 2012;Xu and Wilson, 2012) with singleunits more narrowly tuned than piriform cortical neurons (Xu and Wilson, 2012). Furthermore, local field potential analyses reveal that in odor discrimination-trained animals the EC can signal the OB before odor onset, potentially preparing the system for odor sampling (Kay et al, 1996;Martin et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, left OFC has been found to be activated in several olfactory tasks with specific response to odor identification (Qureshy et al, 2000), passive smelling (Kjelvik et al, 2012), odor discrimination (Plailly et al, 2007), mixture (Boyle et al, 2009), olfactory working memory (Dade et al, 2001), olfactory semantic association (Kareken et al, 2003) and familiarity to odors (Savic and Berglund, 2004). Therefore we may hypothesize, that our map 3, specifically evident in the processing of non-food odors, reflects all these characteristics of the odorant (lily of the valley) excluding the reward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%