“…Indeed, indirect calorimetry was shown to overestimate EE when the RMR was not properly assessed (Fares et al, 2008). Therefore, RMR estimation is highly recommended to avoid bias, particularly as it was shown to be altered in many clinical conditions (Agiovlasitis et al, 2012, Alawad et al, 2013, Gajewski et al, 2017, Mahler et al, 2012, Montaurier et al, 2007, Nawata et al, 2004, Serra et al, 2015, Wens et al, 2014). Alternatively, METs can be used to estimate EE; Serra et al (Serra et al, 2017) found METs to be the strongest predictor of activity counts, despite explaining only 65% of the accelerometer activity counts.…”