2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-008-0285-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The House Sparrow Passer domesticus in urban areas: reviewing a possible link between post-decline distribution and human socioeconomic status

Abstract: The House Sparrow Passer domesticus is traditionally associated with human habitation. However, the species has undergone dramatic declines in many urban areas in north-western Europe. There are many theories as to why this decline has occurred, but the lack of data on House Sparrow numbers prior to their decline has hampered efforts to investigate these theories in detail. This review summarises the demographic changes in urban House Sparrow populations since the 1970s, and considers evidence that the current… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
123
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
123
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The availability of suitable nesting sites limits breeding density (Newton 1998) and with the removal of mature and dead trees typical of suburbia, there will be fewer natural nest sites in such areas (Wiebe 2011). Buildings may provide some cavities, but modern or refurbished houses tend to have fewer potential nesting holes to compensate for this loss of nesting sites (Mason 2006;Shaw et al 2008). As a result, the provision of nest boxes in urban areas may be a particularly valuable resource, allowing cavity nesters to prosper (Chace and Walsh 2006;Wiebe 2011) and providing an opportunity to investigate factors affecting urban bird breeding biology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of suitable nesting sites limits breeding density (Newton 1998) and with the removal of mature and dead trees typical of suburbia, there will be fewer natural nest sites in such areas (Wiebe 2011). Buildings may provide some cavities, but modern or refurbished houses tend to have fewer potential nesting holes to compensate for this loss of nesting sites (Mason 2006;Shaw et al 2008). As a result, the provision of nest boxes in urban areas may be a particularly valuable resource, allowing cavity nesters to prosper (Chace and Walsh 2006;Wiebe 2011) and providing an opportunity to investigate factors affecting urban bird breeding biology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consensus emerging from these studies on the cause of urban sparrow declines was summarised by Shaw et al (2008), who reasoned that variation in the development and maintenance of urban landscapes explains the evidence that sparrows have declined less in areas with lower socio-economic status. Thus, 'deprived' areas are said to provide more nest sites in ill-maintained buildings, and more feeding opportunities in gardens with mainly native shrubs, while sparrows in affluent areas are deprived of nesting opportunities through home improvements and modern building techniques and of feeding opportunities by development of brown-field sites and conversion of gardens for off-road parking.…”
Section: Reproduction and Habitat Use In Urban Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However this is difficult to reconcile with reported densities of around 2 per hectare for residential areas with gardens and between 1 and 2 per hectare for residential areas lacking gardens altogether. Meanwhile Shaw et al (2008) argue that stability of Sparrow populations in low status districts of cities can be explained by greater prevalence of native shrubs supporting higher densities of insects. All such explanations may be redundant however, since a simple explanation of variation in urban Sparrow declines Vol.…”
Section: Patterns Of Urban Declinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The population decline of this species is also reported throughout North-Western Europe [8,9,10]. Hence, House Sparrow is now listed in a Species of European Conservation Concern (SEPC category 3; Bird life international 2006 [11,12]. Though quite a few hypotheses are put forward to enlighten the declination of the species viz., reduction in food supply, increasing developmental activities, reduced availability of nest sites, and electromagnetic radiation, but there is no strong evidence to support any of these [13,14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%