2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The host galaxies of X-ray selected active galactic nuclei toz= 2.5: Structure, star formation, and their relationships from CANDELS andHerschel/PACS

Abstract: We study the relationship between the structure and star formation rate (SFR) of X-ray selected low and moderate luminosity active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in the two Chandra Deep Fields, using Hubble Space Telescope imaging from the Cosmic Assembly Near Infrared Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) and deep far-infrared maps from the PEP+GOODS-Herschel survey. We derive detailed distributions of structural parameters and FIR luminosities from carefully constructed control samples of galaxies, which we then com… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
6
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They find galaxies in the current state of a merger are ≈ 2-7 times more likely to contain a luminous AGN than their non-interacting counterparts. This quantitatively agrees with previous studies, who also find a noticeable enhancement in the fraction of AGN that reside in either close pairs or morphologically disturbed hosts above a control sample (e.g, Cotini et al 2013;Ellison et al 2011Ellison et al , 2013Ellison et al , 2015Koss et al 2010;Satyapal et al 2014;Rosario et al 2015;Koss et al 2018). Yet, again, many low-redshift studies also fail to find a distinction between the AGN fraction of interacting and non-interacting galaxies (e.g, Cisternas et al 2011;Villforth et al 2014;Hewlett et al 2017;Villforth et al 2017).…”
Section: Agn Luminositysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They find galaxies in the current state of a merger are ≈ 2-7 times more likely to contain a luminous AGN than their non-interacting counterparts. This quantitatively agrees with previous studies, who also find a noticeable enhancement in the fraction of AGN that reside in either close pairs or morphologically disturbed hosts above a control sample (e.g, Cotini et al 2013;Ellison et al 2011Ellison et al , 2013Ellison et al , 2015Koss et al 2010;Satyapal et al 2014;Rosario et al 2015;Koss et al 2018). Yet, again, many low-redshift studies also fail to find a distinction between the AGN fraction of interacting and non-interacting galaxies (e.g, Cisternas et al 2011;Villforth et al 2014;Hewlett et al 2017;Villforth et al 2017).…”
Section: Agn Luminositysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In general, the fraction of the coeval galaxy population with major merger signatures is comparable to that found for the (majority of) distant AGNs, when the galaxy sample is matched in mass to the AGN sample; however, see Rosario et al (2014) for tentative evidence of a factor ≈ 2 decrease in the fraction of z = 0.5-1.0 galaxies with major-merger signatures when compared to the coeval AGN population. More significant differences are found by the present day, with a ≈ 5 times lower fraction of the galaxy population hosted in major mergers when compared to Swift-BAT selected AGNs (≈ 4% vs. ≈ 20%; Cotini et al 2013).…”
Section: Host-galaxy Morphologiessupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The lack of evidence for merger-driven AGN growth in typical Seyfert-luminosity, X-ray selected AGNs (Sánchez et al 2004;Grogin et al 2005;Pierce et al 2007;Gabor et al 2009;Cisternas et al 2011b;Schawinski et al 2011;Kocevski et al 2012;Simmons et al 2012;Villforth et al 2014;Rosario et al 2015;Bruce et al 2016) can therefore be attributed to looking for mergers among the wrong population of AGNs/ hosts. By targeting luminous and heavily obscured AGNs using IR selection, we have selected exactly the sample of AGNs most likely to be merger driven, and indeed find evidence that the vast majority are heavily disturbed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of AGN hosts in the GEMS, GOODS, AEGIS, and COSMOS fields have predominantly targeted X-ray selected AGNs at z 0.2 1.3 < < (Sánchez et al 2004;Grogin et al 2005;Pierce et al 2007;Gabor et al 2009;Cisternas et al 2011b;Simmons et al 2012;Villforth et al 2014;Rosario et al 2015;Bruce et al 2016). While a small fraction of these AGN hosts show strong distortions, the rate of morphological disturbances is similar to that of inactive galaxy control samples, suggesting that mergers do not play a dominant role in AGN fueling, at least out to z 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%