2007
DOI: 10.1097/blo.0b013e31803372a7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hospital-Physician Relationship

Abstract: The traditional hospital-physician relationship in the United States was an implicit symbiotic collaboration sheltered by financial success. The health care economic challenges of the 1980s and 1990s unmasked the weaknesses of this relationship as hospitals and doctors often found themselves in direct competition in the struggle to maintain revenue. We recount and examine the history of the largely implicit American hospital-physician relationship and propose a means of establishing formal, explicit hospital-p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the economic problems convinced the healthcare administrators to put a limit on healthcare spending, and this change in practice revealed the issues in the relationships between hospital administrators and physicians. 75,76 Therefore, the relationships of physicians and administrators are professional if the former is in charge of caring for patients and the latter is in charge of preparing the material objects for the provision of patient care. 59…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the economic problems convinced the healthcare administrators to put a limit on healthcare spending, and this change in practice revealed the issues in the relationships between hospital administrators and physicians. 75,76 Therefore, the relationships of physicians and administrators are professional if the former is in charge of caring for patients and the latter is in charge of preparing the material objects for the provision of patient care. 59…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the economic problems convinced the healthcare administrators to put a limit on healthcare spending, and this change in practice revealed the issues in the relationships between hospital administrators and physicians. 75,76 Therefore, the relationships of physicians and administrators are professional if the former is in charge of caring for patients and the latter is in charge of preparing the material objects for the provision of patient care. 59 Gradually, hospital administrators realized that sharing power with physicians benefits hospitals because physicians are the high spenders of the budget and their involvement in decision-making enables hospital administrators to influence the control of the budget.…”
Section: Brief Overview Of Recommendations By Physician Leadersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an exclusive right to decide who is authorized to carry out tasks and how [18]) did not find it easy to adhere to programming the clinical activities under their responsibility. In this regard, a number of authors highlight the importance of trust [6,13,22] in a relationship based on shared values, the definition of collective concerns, and the standardization of productive practices. Consequently, trust is a tool for predicting action and achieving objectives.…”
Section: Activities For Which Decisions Can Be Programmedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physicians' involvement in the management of clinical activities in health care institutions is therefore of high importance, as the cost, quality, and relevance of patient care depend on the attitude, actions, and level of their cooperation with other health professionals [6]. Research shows that physician involvement in the management of hospital clinical activities is critical to the safety and quality of care [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the hospitals, which must pay the difference between the PPI procedure cost and the insurance reimbursement, are understandably sensitive to the price of PPIs, which can be significant. For example, for some orthopedic procedures the PPI costs can be up to 40-80 percent of the reimbursement received, according to industry reports cited by Hariri et al (2007) and Montgomery and Schneller (2007). In addition to this challenge, in regions with multiple hospitals, physicians are able to select the facilities where they perform a given procedure and may consider the availability of a PPI at a facility when determining where to admit patients (Burns et al 2009;Robinson 2008;Schneller & Smeltzer 2006;Wilson et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%