2013
DOI: 10.1007/bf03651395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Horn inequalities for submodules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is natural to ask whether a direct connection between these divisibility relations and intersection theory can be made. Indeed, in the context of finitely generated torsion modules over a principal ideal domain, such a connection was made in [10], and it is our purpose to extend that approach to the context of arbitrary C 0 operators. The result is that a sufficient number of these divisibility relations can be obtained from special invariant subspaces M of T .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is natural to ask whether a direct connection between these divisibility relations and intersection theory can be made. Indeed, in the context of finitely generated torsion modules over a principal ideal domain, such a connection was made in [10], and it is our purpose to extend that approach to the context of arbitrary C 0 operators. The result is that a sufficient number of these divisibility relations can be obtained from special invariant subspaces M of T .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Littlewood-Richardson rule in this context and, indeed, in the case of finitely generated modules over a discrete valuation ring, was first proved in [13] (see also [20] for a different argument.) The basic ideas in this paper originated in the study of singular numbers for products of operators [8] and in the study of torsion modules over principal ideal domains [10]. The techniques we use are necessarily different, and they may obscure to some extent the essential simplicity of the arguments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%