2008
DOI: 10.1086/522922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Horizontal Magnetic Flux of the Quiet‐Sun Internetwork as Observed with theHinodeSpectro‐Polarimeter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

71
536
7
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(616 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
71
536
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one may put forward alternative arguments in which this quiet-Sun magnetic field is the result of a global large-scale dynamo: the shredding of a large-scale magnetic field can produce a small-scale magnetic field by cascading magnetic energy to small-scales and the decay of active regions may give rise to a small-scale magnetic field (Spruit et al 1987;de Wijn et al 2005;Stenflo 2012). However, none of these arguments may necessarily be correct because the small-scale magnetic field does not show solar cycle dependence, as it does not have significant correlation with the large-scale global magnetic cycle, and it does not have much latitudinal variation (e.g., Hagenaar et al 2003;Sánchez Almeida 2003;Lites et al 2008;Lites 2011;Buehler et al 2013;Jin & Wang 2015b). Furthermore, using the MDI data set of the entire solar cycle 23, Jin et al (2011) have shown that the cyclic variation of both the number and total flux of small-scale magnetic elements in the range ∼(3-30)×10 18 Mx are anticorrelated with the sunspot number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one may put forward alternative arguments in which this quiet-Sun magnetic field is the result of a global large-scale dynamo: the shredding of a large-scale magnetic field can produce a small-scale magnetic field by cascading magnetic energy to small-scales and the decay of active regions may give rise to a small-scale magnetic field (Spruit et al 1987;de Wijn et al 2005;Stenflo 2012). However, none of these arguments may necessarily be correct because the small-scale magnetic field does not show solar cycle dependence, as it does not have significant correlation with the large-scale global magnetic cycle, and it does not have much latitudinal variation (e.g., Hagenaar et al 2003;Sánchez Almeida 2003;Lites et al 2008;Lites 2011;Buehler et al 2013;Jin & Wang 2015b). Furthermore, using the MDI data set of the entire solar cycle 23, Jin et al (2011) have shown that the cyclic variation of both the number and total flux of small-scale magnetic elements in the range ∼(3-30)×10 18 Mx are anticorrelated with the sunspot number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cattaneo 1999, Vögler & Schüssler 2007. Turbulent dynamo action may be responsible for the smallest-scale magnetic elements observed on the solar surface (Lites et al 2008), although intranetwork magnetic elements may also result from the decay of larger magnetic regions (created by the global dynamo) through the continuous convective mixing of the solar upper layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New observations from the Hinode Stokes Polarimeter (SP) (with a spatial resolution of 0.3) reveal the ubiquitous presence of horizontal fields with an average value of about 55 G (Lites 2008). These observations show that, whereas the vertical magnetic field mainly occurs in the intergranular lanes at the network boundaries, the field in the internetwork regions is dominantly horizontal and well separated from the vertical fields.…”
Section: Internetwork Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%