2005
DOI: 10.1680/geot.2005.55.4.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The horizontal failure mechanism of the Wilnis peat dyke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although deformations in LOS direction can already give significant insight in levee deformations by providing binary spatial information on the stability of a levee (i.e., stable/unstable), two‐dimensional (2D) deformation vectors can be particularly relevant for specific failure mechanisms. For instance, deformation in horizontal direction can be an early warning for an instability failure, for example, a peat levee failure near Wilnis, the Netherlands failed in the year 2005 due to a horizontal sliding (van Baars, ). Likewise, subsidence of the levee, which is mostly observed in vertical direction, would lead to hydraulic failures, that is, overtopping and overflow.…”
Section: Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although deformations in LOS direction can already give significant insight in levee deformations by providing binary spatial information on the stability of a levee (i.e., stable/unstable), two‐dimensional (2D) deformation vectors can be particularly relevant for specific failure mechanisms. For instance, deformation in horizontal direction can be an early warning for an instability failure, for example, a peat levee failure near Wilnis, the Netherlands failed in the year 2005 due to a horizontal sliding (van Baars, ). Likewise, subsidence of the levee, which is mostly observed in vertical direction, would lead to hydraulic failures, that is, overtopping and overflow.…”
Section: Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of failure of the primary river dykes and embankments, totalling in length about 3200 km, is small, as most of them have been designed and constructed for a frequency of flood occurrence of up to 1/1250 yr −1 (Van Baars and Van Kempen, ). However the secondary dykes, built along inland canals to prevent the flooding of surrounding lands, are often built from peat and have a greater risk of failure, especially during prolonged dry periods in summer when the peat can start to crack due to drought stress in the core of the dyke (Van Baars, ). Each province and municipality has the legal obligation to prepare emergency scenario maps for flooding risk as well as other kinds of risk.…”
Section: Flood Risk Assessment and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest point north of Rotterdam is some 7 m below MSL. To prevent these areas from flooding, 3200 km of primary dykes have been built along the coast and the main rivers along with about 14 000 km of inland or secondary dykes (Van Baars, ). Drainage is needed to make these low‐lying areas suitable for agriculture or other land uses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to note that stability assessments for peat embankments, dikes and natural slopes require methods that deal with uncertainties concerning the ambient conditions, as well as their effects on the soil properties, conditions and behaviourfor instance, the effect of a possible drought or biogas produced internally reducing the self-weight of the peat mass, the influence of gas formation at the base of dikes on their stability, effectivestress reductions due to hydraulic connections by way of shrinkage cracks and (or) more permeable layers underlying the peat layer (see Bezuijen et al (2005), Boylan et al (2008), Den Haan and Kruse (2007) and van Baars (2005)). …”
Section: Geotechnical Research Volume 4 Issue Gr3mentioning
confidence: 99%