2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The home environment and childhood obesity in low-income households: indirect effects via sleep duration and screen time

Abstract: BackgroundChildhood obesity disproportionally affects children from low-income households. With the aim of informing interventions, this study examined pathways through which the physical and social home environment may promote childhood overweight/obesity in low-income households.MethodsData on health behaviors and the home environment were collected at home visits in low-income, urban households with either only normal weight (n = 48) or predominantly overweight/obese (n = 55) children aged 6–13 years. Resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
90
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A socioecological framework conceptualizes a child within a family and the causal arrows of child and family factors may be bi-directional, though empirical evidence supports family chaos as a mediating variable for child problem behaviors (Bronfenbrenner, 1986; Evans, Gonnella, Marcynyszyn, Gentile, & Salpekar, 2005). Regarding risk for obesity, Appelhans and colleagues recruited low-income families (18% Hispanic) and found a significant positive relationship between family chaos and child weight status that was mediated by short sleep duration and higher screen time (Appelhans et al, 2014). While the study provided initial evidence linking family chaos with sleep duration, other important factors were not assessed, including child emotional and behavioral problems.…”
Section: Family Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A socioecological framework conceptualizes a child within a family and the causal arrows of child and family factors may be bi-directional, though empirical evidence supports family chaos as a mediating variable for child problem behaviors (Bronfenbrenner, 1986; Evans, Gonnella, Marcynyszyn, Gentile, & Salpekar, 2005). Regarding risk for obesity, Appelhans and colleagues recruited low-income families (18% Hispanic) and found a significant positive relationship between family chaos and child weight status that was mediated by short sleep duration and higher screen time (Appelhans et al, 2014). While the study provided initial evidence linking family chaos with sleep duration, other important factors were not assessed, including child emotional and behavioral problems.…”
Section: Family Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such evidence would support that inadequate amounts of sleep will lead to endoplasmic reticulum stress in hypothalamic neurons, to alterations in some of the neuropeptides that regulate appetite, such as increased levels of ghrelin, reduced levels of leptin, and reduced central biological activity of orexin, all of which would then converge to increase food intake and reduce satiety [27-29] [30]. Under particular circumstances, the correlation of insufficient sleep with food desire and screen time emerges as being particularly prominent, especially among children and adolescents [23, 31-33]. Despite aforementioned comments, we should also note that although the overall data are supportive of an association between short sleep duration and increased risk for obesity, some studies have been somewhat conflictive for any of the age groups examined.…”
Section: Obesity and Sleepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The association between media exposure and childhood obesity has been supported by research over the past several decades, [1][2][3] with both media exposure and obesity more prevalent among minorities and lower socioeconomic groups. [4][5][6][7] In addition, increased media exposure is associated with higher risk of multiple medical problems, including hypertension, 8 high cholesterol, 8 diabetes, 9 psychological and social issues, 9,10 and sleep disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%