The Home Bias in Sovereign Ratings

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes.You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. licence. www.econstor.eu Abstract: Credit rating agencies are frequently criticized for producing sovereign ratings that do not accurately reflect the economic and political fundamentals of rated countries. This article discusses how the home country of rating agencies could affect rating decisions as a result of political economy influences and culture. Using data from nine agencies based in six countries, we investigate empirically if there is systematic evidence for a home bias in sovereign ratings. Specifically, we use dyadic panel data to test whether, all else being equal, agencies assign better ratings to their home countries, as well as to countries economically, politically and culturally aligned with them. While most of the variation in ratings is explained by the fundamentals of rated countries, our results provide empirical support for the existence of a home bias in sovereign ratings. We find that the bias becomes more accentuated following the onset of the Global Financial Crisis and appears to be driven by economic and cultural ties, not geopolitics. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated JEL codes: G24, F34, H63, F65, G15Key words: Sovereign debt ratings, credit rating agencies, home bias, international finance, cultural distance, bank exposure 4 distance between the home country of the agency and the rated country could affect ratings as well. For example, the economic situation of a country that is culturally closer to the home country of the rating agency might appear more positive to analysts than an objective assessment would justify. Thus, our work also contributes to the literature on the effect of cultural biases (Grinblatt and Keloharju 2001;Guiso et al. 2006Guiso et al. , 2009Giannetti and Yafeh 2012).Is there systematic empirical evidence of a home bias in sovereign ratings? We examine whether the home country's economic and geopolitical interests in rated countries as well as cultural distance to rated countries are related to rating outcomes. For this purpose, we use monthly dyadic ...

Sovereign credit ratings and central banks: Why do analysts pay attention to institutions?

“…Research has recently noted the differences in methodology among credit rating agencies (Fuchs & Gehring, 2013), and our findings further suggest that this is a fruitful avenue for future research, as are the potential differences in reaction between rating agencies and actual investors. The legal independence of the central bank is robustly associated with higher credit ratings by Moody's across all our model specifications.…”

“…Beaulieu et al (2012) argue that access to credit ratings is also important and run models for selection into the ratings, i.e., they model countries' access to credit in the first stage and the level of the rating in the second stage. Following Beaulieu et al (2012) and Fuchs and Gehring (2013), we include in the first stage, half-decade dummies and the lagged number of countries rated by the credit rating agency worldwide. When taking potential selection into account, our central bank governance measures continue to be statistically significant.…”

Distance Diffusion of Home Bias for Crowdfunding Campaigns between Categories: Insights from Data Analytics

“…Home bias affects many aspects of user behavior, including economics, geopolitics, culture, and consumer habits. Users tend to invest in projects that are culturally similar to their respective home countries [26].…”

Bondholders vs. Direct Investors? Competing Responses to Expropriation

“…Prior scholarship extensively examines the political determinants of FDI (for example, Jensen, Biglaiser, Li, Malesky, Pinto, Pinto, and Staats ), and a growing literature looks at how political developments affect sovereign bondholders . Sovereign rating agencies prioritize a country's default history and macroeconomic indicators (Cantor and Packer ; Afonso, Gomes, and Rother ; Archer, Biglaiser, and DeRouen ), but Fuchs and Gehring () find systematic home bias across rating agencies from six countries. Moreover, Biglaiser and Staats () find that judicial quality and the rule of law also affect ratings.…”