2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-012-0276-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
59
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected the Hoek and Brown criterion adapted to rocks with anisotropic strength [30,31] for a more accurate account of the experimental results. The Hoek and Brown criterion has been applied successfully to a wide range of intact and fractured rock types [44,45] by practitioners in rock engineering for over 30 years. The use of the Hoek and Brown criterion in petroleum engineering is not common because of the uncertainties related to the determination of the controlling parameters.…”
Section: Selection Of Strength Criteria For Rocks With Strength Anisomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected the Hoek and Brown criterion adapted to rocks with anisotropic strength [30,31] for a more accurate account of the experimental results. The Hoek and Brown criterion has been applied successfully to a wide range of intact and fractured rock types [44,45] by practitioners in rock engineering for over 30 years. The use of the Hoek and Brown criterion in petroleum engineering is not common because of the uncertainties related to the determination of the controlling parameters.…”
Section: Selection Of Strength Criteria For Rocks With Strength Anisomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hoek and Brown criterion [29] is an empirical relationship used to describe the non-linear increase in peak strength of isotropic rock with increasing confining stress [44]. The criterion was developed to estimate the strength of rock masses and intact rocks.…”
Section: The Hoek and Brown Criterion Applied To Transversely Isotropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With no volume change, linear Mohr-Coulomb failure is no longer appropriate. Under these conditions, the failure envelope as plotted on a Mohr stress diagram flattens (e.g., by the Von Mises criterion [e.g., van Der Pluijm and Marshak, 2004]), implying predominantly grain boundary sliding rather than dilatant cracking as the main mechanism of brittle deformation and giving an angle of 90 ∘ between optimally oriented conjugate shear zones [van Der Pluijm and Marshak, 2004;Eberhardt, 2012]. As a consequence, our observed value of 80 ∘ may reflect the formation of these deep faults in an environment that requires a significant level of grain boundary sliding.…”
Section: Complexity Of Rupture and Breaking Of Young Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in confinement of 0.43 MPa causes the difference in strength of 3.41 MPa. According to Eberhardt (2012), non-linear Equation 9 is dependent on the confinement, in which the criterion is controlled by the major and minor principal stresses. However, as all five tunnel structures were (or will be) excavated into weak rock at shallow depths, the ci plays a dominant role in estimating the strength of the soft rock masses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hoek-Brown criterion is non-linear (Eberhardt, 2012), and is suitable for hard rock material. The failure of hard rock follows a non-linear envelope on the graph of major and minor principal stresses, (1 and 3), (Hoek & Brown, 1994):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%