2007
DOI: 10.1484/j.nml.2.302743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The History of the Book

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… For a fuller discussion of this point and book culture vs. print culture (from the perspective that print is an interesting technology, but not in itself influential enough to provoke or sustain a significant cultural shift), see Gillespie and Dane. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… For a fuller discussion of this point and book culture vs. print culture (from the perspective that print is an interesting technology, but not in itself influential enough to provoke or sustain a significant cultural shift), see Gillespie and Dane. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Gillespie deliberately shies away from an engagement with form qua new formalism, her article is concerned explicitly with the literariness of a text and the manner by which that can be recovered through those formal features framed by the manuscript in question. Knowing there existed a scribe named Adam Pinkhurst does not tell us what the poem ‘Chauciers Wordes’ means nor how it means it: instead it reveals that neither literature nor book history can fully resolve the ‘perennial human desire for origins and endings’ (Gillespie 272).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%