The History of Stuttering by 7 Years of Age: Follow-Up of a Prospective Community Cohort

Kefalianos, Elaina; Onslow, Mark; Packman, Ann; Vogel, Adam P.; Pezic, Angela; Mensah, Fiona; Conway, Laura; Bavin, Edith L.; Block, Susan; Reilly, Sheena

doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-16-0205

Cited by 54 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…, 2-3세 일반아동의 비유창성 특성 (Yairi, 1981(Yairi, , 1982, 말더듬 발생시기에 따른 비유창성 특성 (Yairi & Lewis, 1984), 말더듬 지속 및 회복집단의 비유창성 특성 (Yairi & Ambrose, 1999 Yairi, Loucks, Seery, & Throneburg, 2015;Usler, Smith, & Weber, 2017;Watts, Eadie, Block, Mensah, & Reilly, 2017), 말더듬 아동의 심리적 측면에 대한 특성연구도 이루어지고 있다 (Ambrose et al, 2015;Kefalianos et al, 2017a;Kefalianos, Onslow, Ukoumunne, Block, & Reilly, 2017b;Smith et al, 2017 Millard, Nicholas, & Cook, 2008;Riley & Ingham, 2000;Trajkovski et al, 2009;Park, Lee, & Sim, 2015 (Buhr & Zebrowski, 2009;Hall, Amir, & Yairi, 1999;Hilger, Zelaznik, & Smith, 2016;Kloth, Janssen, Kraaimaat, & Brutten, 1998;Kloth, Kraaimaat, Janssen, & Brutten, 1999;Paden, Ambrose, & Yairi, 2002;Ryan, 2001;Throneburg & Yairi, 2001;Wagovich, Hall, & Clifford, 2009;Yairi & Ambrose, 1999 (Buhr & Zebrowski, 2009;Hall et al, 1999;Kloth et al, 1998Kloth et al, , 1999Ryan, 2001;Throneburg & Yairi, 2001;Yairi & Ambrose, 1999 Hall et al, 1999;Kloth, Janssen, Kraaimaat, & Brutten, 1995;Kloth et al, 1998…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Comparison of study typesAmbrose et al, 2015;Kefalianos et al, 2017aKefalianos et al, , 2017bShimada, Toyomura, Fujii, & Minami, 2018;Watts et al, 2017), 집단 간 특성 비교연구는 2편(25%; 예:Smith et al, 2017;Usler et al, 2017), 말더듬 집단 내 특성은 1편(13%; 예: Franken, Koenraads, Holtmaat, & van der Schroeff, 2018)으로 나타났다.…”

unclassified

“…특히 Ambrose 등(2015)의 연구는 비정상적 비유 창성 빈도를 48개월 동안 측정하였고, 다른 변인들을 24개월 동안 추적하여 개별 논문으로 분석하였다. 국외의 특성 및 비교연구 6편은 cohort 집단연구로 2편(예: Shimada et al, 2018; Watts et al, 2017)을 제외한 4편(예:Kefalianos et al, 2017aKefalianos et al, , 2017bSmith et al, 2017;Usler et al, 2017)의 논문은 5년 Comparison of study period…”

unclassified

“…6명만이 유의한 차이를 보이는 것으로 나타났다(Kefalianos et al, 2017b). 또한, 말더듬회복집단이 말더듬지속집단 에 비해 7세 시점에 비구어적 인지, 기질, 부모보고에 의한 삶의 질 에서도 차이가 나타나지 않았다(Kefalianos et al, 2017a).…”

unclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Research Trends on the Longitudinal Studies of Childhood Stuttering

Lee¹,

Park²,

Sim³

2019

Commun Sci Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to review research trends for longitudinal studies of children who stutter (CWS) and to provide evidence-based directions for longitudinal research and Smart Device for Utterance Analysis (SDUA) application. Methods: Included articles were published 1990-2018 in domestic journals (Communication & Sciences Disorders and Journal of Speech-Language & Hearing Disorders) and international journals (Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research and Journal of Fluency Disorders). Results: Twenty-eight articles that met the criteria were chosen. The results showed that 12 articles (42%) compared CWS with CWNS (children who do not stutter), or a CWS recovery group with a persistence group. Eight articles (29%) studied treatment and 8 articles (29%) identified characteristics of CWS. In terms of participants, 3 articles (11%) included children under 1 years old, and 25 articles (89%) included children between the ages of 2 and 6. In regards to the method of research, the majority of treatment-comparison research examined the between group differences, and characteristic research examined both between and within group differences. In domestic articles, the research was mostly conducted over 18 months, and in international articles, the research was mostly conducted for 24months. In treatment-comparison research, between 11 and 20 participants were included in domestic articles, and between 21 and 50 participants in international articles. Characteristics research included over 100 participants (44%). The dependent variables mostly were examined utterance analysis for change. Conclusion: The majority of longitudinal studies measured more than two dependent variables for more than 6 months of research. This study demonstrated that all research was following evidence-based treatment. The SDUA application was found to measure the child's language and speech characteristics, parental characteristics, and to collect and analyze longitudinal data.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Research Trends on the Longitudinal Studies of Childhood Stuttering

Lee¹,

Park²,

Sim³

2019

Commun Sci Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The risk factors contributing to persistence in stuttering can be used as a guide to decision making. 40,[51][52][53][54] This model of treating preschool stuttering can be far less burdensome on the healthcare system than unnecessary treatment or deferred treatment, which may place a child at greater risk of persistent chronic stuttering development. We propose a stepped care model to stuttering, described later and outlined in Fig.…”

Section: A Model For Prioritizing Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Are the Options for the Treatment of Stuttering in Preschool Children?

Shenker¹,

Santayana²

2018

Semin Speech Lang

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Treatment of stuttering during the preschool years is considered to be the best prevention of persistent chronic stuttering; however, many clinicians do not feel comfortable treating stuttering and may be confused about choosing an intervention. This article summarizes the history of direct and indirect methodology for treatment of stuttering in preschool children. It provides an update of contemporary treatments and discusses issues related to the timing of treatment. Guidelines for choosing a level of treatment based on the risk of a preschool child continuing to stutter are discussed, with examples of which children would be most appropriate for which level of intervention.

show abstract

Non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering in children aged between birth and six years

Sjøstrand

Kefalianos

Hofslundsengen

et al. 2019

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: Primary objective To assess the immediate and long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering on speech outcomes in children aged between birth and six years. Secondary objective To describe the relationship between intervention effects and participant characteristics (i.e. child age, child's communication attitudes and the impact stuttering has on the child's QoL). Non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering in children aged between birth and six years (Protocol)

show abstract

The History of Stuttering by 7 Years of Age: Follow-Up of a Prospective Community Cohort

Abstract: Overall, findings suggested that there may be associations between language ability and recovery from stuttering. Subsequent research is needed to explore the directionality of this relationship.

Cited by 54 publications

References 45 publications

Research Trends on the Longitudinal Studies of Childhood Stuttering

Research Trends on the Longitudinal Studies of Childhood Stuttering

What Are the Options for the Treatment of Stuttering in Preschool Children?

Non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering in children aged between birth and six years

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About