1987
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90020-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The history of some fundamental concepts in bone biomechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It was not stated in those terms then, but this is clearly what he was on to. Nothing else ' but what nowadays would be described as a biological control process ' (Roesler, 1987). Although this sounds quite reasonable in our time, in which regulatory processes and control theory are well known, it hardly moved the scientific community in bone biology.…”
Section: '  mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was not stated in those terms then, but this is clearly what he was on to. Nothing else ' but what nowadays would be described as a biological control process ' (Roesler, 1987). Although this sounds quite reasonable in our time, in which regulatory processes and control theory are well known, it hardly moved the scientific community in bone biology.…”
Section: '  mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…From the results, Wolff concluded that trabecular morphology matches the stress trajectories, which proposition is now called his ' trajectorial hypothesis ', basically the gist of what Wolff 's Law entails. But out of this ' Law ', blended with theories from others, eventually grew the paradigm that bones were formed as mechanically optimal structures of maximal strength and minimal weight, in accordance with particular mathematical rules (Roesler, 1987). Thus, trabecular architecture would be an answer to requirements of structural optimisation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These data lead to the belief that the periodontium underwent functional adaptation, having adapted to a pathological state due to significant changes in the magnitude, frequency of event and change in direction of the force vectors of the occlusal demand 18,19 . Thus, it may be hypothesized that the 1 st lower molar of the animals may have undergone functional adaptation due to possible tooth migration or inclination involving force vectors 20 , permitting control of the damage during the applied experimental period (14, 21 and 28 days).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%